Apollo 17 Crashes back on the Moon

[supermeerkat]

I found this gem on YouTube.



The majority of comments, as usual, are that special kind of stupid we all know and love.

[dwight]

Well, one good thing is that there seems to be more of a debate now than a few years ago where it was all HBs and very few PANs. The good thing with these arguments getting more outrageous is that more and more normal folk who may have been swayed by other "more robust" [sic] arguments can now see the HB camp as being proposterous.

[tedward]

Oh my giddy aunt.

[dwight]

This is just part of the fun and games dealing with the evil gubmint:

"...well there are many different theories, the one that comes closer is that the LEMS landed unmanned, that does not however indicate that this video is true at all, indeed the LEM could be Pulled up by a cable in a studio, the idea it simply sets the concept wheel in motion, there are many different Hoax ideas & concepts, what is truer to you is what can be reality. It is of my opinion that all of the missions were staged, but there had to be some physical landing if they were tracked."

[astronaut23]

Wow, talk about idiotic.

Isn't it easier to believe the landings are real than all the loopholes you have to jump through to figure out how you could pull off a hoax of this magnitude that would fool all the geologists, people running the tracking stations, and multitudes of other things?

If you could land a lander that big on the moon unmanned then why the heck wouldn't you just land manned. Makes no sense really. And where the heck does he even get that it crashed? Talk about stupid.

And I'm ashamed to say I got conned by the moon hoax crowd a while back but I'm leaning heavily to-wards it being real since studying more about it and reading the technical things on this board. Bart Sibrel is either badly misinformed or is just trying to make a buck, I'm not sure what his motives are. But is he really stupid as to think he would ever get sent a classified tape showing Apollo being staged. If you did hoax something and you wanted to make sure it was now found out you would destroy the evidence that you did hoax it.

But his evidence is dumb anyways. He says they were faking out of a round porthole in the command module but that was the wrong window. The window in the hatch was round but not the one he said they were faking out of the side of the command module. That one was more triangular shaped window. Also in that same video someone said that Armstrong had never done an interview since the Apollo 11 flight and thats a lie.


I'm glad the Scientific Equipment Bay pendulum happened on the Apollo 14 mission even though it was unintentional. This is irrefutable proof right here. Its what really convinced me of the genuineness of them being on the real moon. Theres no reasonable explanation of how they could have faked this? Even if they did this in vacuum chamber on earth and slowed down the footage if you speed it up to 200% speed the movement of the astronauts is not realistic so if it was filmed on earth it would have to be done inside a machine that no only created vacuum but lowered the gravity to 1/6 somehow. LOL.


www.youtube.com/user/BlisterHiker#p/u/8/01A61jra37o

[laurel]

Welcome to the board, Astronaut23.

[banjomd]

Yes, welcome.
Have you seen this interview?
rt.com/Top_News/2009-07-21/I_could_see_Armstrong_bouncing_on_the_moon.html?fullstory

[astronaut23]

Oct 6, 2010 11:56:16 GMT -4 banjomd said:

Yes, welcome.
Have you seen this interview?
rt.com/Top_News/2009-07-21/I_could_see_Armstrong_bouncing_on_the_moon.html?fullstory

Never seen the interview, nice. Awesome about how Leonov talks about how foolish the moon hoax crowd is. They were the ones competing against us in the race to the moon and they acknowledge that Apollo was a reality.

[Data Cable]

Oct 6, 2010 10:11:16 GMT -4 astronaut23 said:

Isn't it easier to believe the landings are real than all the loopholes you have to jump through to figure out how you could pull off a hoax of this magnitude that would fool all the geologists, people running the tracking stations, and multitudes of other things?

I tend to look at it from the other direction. If a gub'mint (or some shadowy division thereof) actually had the ability to pull off all the outrageous engineering, payoffs, intimidation and secret assassinations necessary to keep the hoax quiet for 40+ years, would it not already be such an all-powerful totalitarian state that it wouldn't even need to fake a moon landing (or six) for whatever nubulous purpose(es) the HB's claim said hoax was perpetrated for in the first place?

[PhantomWolf]

I may be wrong but isn't that the Apollo 16 footage?

[tikkitakki]

Oct 9, 2010 4:25:28 GMT -4 PhantomWolf said:

I may be wrong but isn't that the Apollo 16 footage?

Nope, it is Apollo 17.

This is Apollo 16:

[chew]

Oh, no! Apollo 16 crashed, too???

[Bob B.]

Here's a photo of yesterday's Soyuz launch from Kazakhstan:



OMG, it's crashing back on Earth!

[astronaut23]

Thats funny. I guess the moon hoax crowd thinks rockets are supposed to just go straight up until fuel burnout with no pitchover.

Just like the stupid stars thing you can show it in pictures that have to do with other missions. I've seen pictures of the black sky in photos that show the ISS in orbit and guess what no stars. ISS must be fake too.

[lukepemberton]

I really do despair for the future of the human race. Many of the theories and ideas are simple laziness or dishonest researching.

It's a bit like Rene and all the excuses he made about academics not replying to his theories. All he had to do was go and ask a high school physics teacher, and most of his folly could have been answered quite simply. In this example, it is a simple case of joining a board and asking why what is observed occurs. Oh but no, the decision is to willfully denigrate the achievements of others through shear ignorance and ego. What makes this example so ludicrous is that it is just made up nonsense.