|
Post by PeterB on Apr 24, 2007 2:53:06 GMT -4
What's a wonk?
The closest word I know to it is "wonky", which just means uneven, or askew, something like that.
But in the context I read the word, it seems to mean someone involved in the political scene somehow.
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Apr 24, 2007 2:55:50 GMT -4
Yup. In short, it's a person who works in the political scene without necessarily being a politician--William Safire calls himself a wonk sometimes, though he usually modifies the word. "Policy wonk" is a favorite term of his.
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Apr 24, 2007 12:06:37 GMT -4
It's sort of like what the term "geek" has become - self-referential and somewhat self-depreciating. The person refering to themselves as a "wonk" is basically saying that they know their attachment to politics is unnusual and possibly unhealthy but they take a little pride in it anyway.
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Apr 24, 2007 12:07:53 GMT -4
I wear my geekiness with pride.
|
|
|
Post by Bill Thompson on Apr 24, 2007 17:01:04 GMT -4
All I can think of is Willy Wonka
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Apr 24, 2007 18:58:26 GMT -4
You mean self-deprecating, Jason, but quite right other than that. I will note, however, that "wonk" is closer to a job description than "geek" is.
Where'd you come across the term, Peter?
|
|
Al Johnston
"Cheer up!" they said, "It could be worse!" So I did, and it was.
Posts: 1,453
|
Post by Al Johnston on Apr 24, 2007 19:18:14 GMT -4
I've seen it in British newspapers and heard it on TV, I've never actually thought that it was an American term...
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Apr 25, 2007 9:05:19 GMT -4
I've heard it in the U.S. for years, but it sounds more British than American.
|
|
|
Post by PeterB on Apr 25, 2007 9:34:28 GMT -4
Where'd you come across the term, Peter? Reading "Time" magazine. It seems to crop up two or three times each edition.
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Apr 25, 2007 17:52:19 GMT -4
Ah. Yes. Yes, it would.
|
|
|
Post by Obviousman on Apr 27, 2007 3:25:06 GMT -4
I don't read TIME, and must admit I have never heard of the term before.
|
|