|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 14, 2010 14:10:58 GMT -4
Rodin, as I said previously, why wouldn't the "set people" use high velocity gas (an air hose) to simulate the actions of high velocity gas (the DPS nozzle) instead of a broom?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 6, 2010 23:01:01 GMT -4
Maybe the frog is one of those indigenous to Hawaii. The astronouts did visit Mauna Kea(which looks like Hadley) and other lunar looking areas in Hawaii. Maybe it's a wrinkled frog or Poison Arrow frog(Interesting?) or Cane Toad(hallucinating Toad)or maybe the Coqui(also known as the Coke frog) they are trying to irradicate or silence....................... p49ff3 Please tell me your post was a joke.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 6, 2010 12:22:37 GMT -4
If moviemakers could routinely use wire rigs to make stuntmen jump six times higher and further than what could be done on Earth... (with black wires) ...why didn't NASA put on a show and do the same with the Apollo astronauts on the "moonset?" Exactly. Conversely: How high can an astronaut fully suited up with operational PLSS jump on earth? I'm sure he can't jump at all. What is six times nothing? So the whole "six times as high"-way of conceiving this problem is baloney. It seems to me that an HB would be eager to weigh himself down to the Earth weight equivalent of an Apollo suit and PLSS, video himself jumping and leaping, and post the result on YouTube saying, "See? the Apollo astronauts should be able to jump six times as high and far than this!" Could it be that they have tried this, realized that a six times extrapolation matches the lunar footage, then squelched plans for any such revelation?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 5, 2010 18:14:30 GMT -4
If moviemakers could routinely use wire rigs to make stuntmen jump six times higher and further than what could be done on Earth... (with black wires)
...why didn't NASA put on a show and do the same with the Apollo astronauts on the "moonset?"
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 5, 2010 14:41:42 GMT -4
You have to wonder why this thread didn't just go quiet during my absence... What does this have to do with the price of tea in China?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 5, 2010 13:36:50 GMT -4
Why use a broom when striations could easily be created with a high pressure air hose?
Using a broom makes as much sense as lowering a wheeled rover into place instead of rolling it or driving it- that is to say, none at all.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 5, 2010 2:41:50 GMT -4
A weighted feather is still an airfoil, and will flutter in an atmosphere.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 4, 2010 16:32:35 GMT -4
Rodin just played the "whistleblower" card!
...time to take a drink.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 3, 2010 15:37:05 GMT -4
The planet Neptune was discovered with a pencil and paper, and present day solar eclipses were calculated hundreds of years ago, (nineteenth century astronomers knew when the earth would transit the sun in the Martian sky), yet HBs continue to insist that a supercomputer would have been needed to navigate to the Moon.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 2, 2010 16:20:29 GMT -4
Look up some of the threads he's participated in.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Sept 26, 2010 16:35:27 GMT -4
Wow, what a maroon. "I've drawn this line, which I've arbitrarily decided is up-and-down. You can't refute this argument." Especially since the Rover camera is level. www.youtube.com/v/CjNQMLOKiBwBoth of the astronauts' wrist booklets are open, and the pages are dangling like plumb bobs. This can be clearly seen from :21 to :45s in the clip, and the sample bag dangles straight downward at 1:11. The astronauts' lean is caused by their center of gravity being skewed by their PLSSs, and Rodin's "analysis" don't mean squat.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Sept 25, 2010 11:34:49 GMT -4
Well, Duane has been placed on moderation again. He just couldn't argue with a civil tone, always had to insult people or insinuate they were government agents. There were multiple complaints about him. Leopards and spots, etc. Duane? Civil? HA!!
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Sept 24, 2010 23:57:41 GMT -4
Why doesn't the "wind" that causes the flag to wave blow the dust on the "moonset" around?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Sept 22, 2010 16:42:03 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Sept 22, 2010 12:36:05 GMT -4
Are you really going to subject a plane prone to fatigue cracking to the stresses of zero gee flight?
|
|