|
Post by margamatix on Nov 19, 2005 17:57:12 GMT -4
Question was answered, Margamatix. No it wasn't. Please answer it here. A one word answer will suffice. Has Bart Sibrel ever accused Buzz Aldrin of murder?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 19, 2005 17:03:21 GMT -4
Can I please ask once again if Bart Sibrel accused Buzz Aldrin of murder?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 19, 2005 16:05:15 GMT -4
In what way Al? Because he worked for the same organisation?
So if a McDonalds burger-flipper kills someone, every other McDonalds employee is an accessory?
Or what?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 19, 2005 16:00:45 GMT -4
RIGHT! I mean, an innocent man would NEVER be angry when accused of being a liar, a murderer, and a thief! Sibrel accused Buzz Aldrin of being a murderer?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 19, 2005 15:44:50 GMT -4
Speaking of Buzz, did Margamatix ever end up going to Autographica? No, I was in Spain, working at the time. In any event, although I would relish the chance to put it to Buzz Aldrin that his story is a pack of lies, I wouldn't doorstep him at an event such as Autographica because I'm not by nature confrontational and I wouldn't expect him to reply anyway. As to Aldrin's behaviour with regard to Sibrel, I have heard it said many times that a liar will become angry when confronted with his lies. Some of you have seen and commented on my website. I have been asked "How would you feel if Sibrel repeatedly accused you of never having been to Russia?" The answer is that I would immediately offer to debate it all with him on prime-time TV where I would rip his case into shreds and destroy his career within minutes. Wouldn't anybody do this if they were telling the truth?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 27, 2005 19:43:54 GMT -4
Don't ban him, he's the best ally I've got.................
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 27, 2005 19:23:40 GMT -4
Perhaps I will let the administrator of the forum educate you on what all of the rest of us are aware Not English Grammar, then?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 27, 2005 18:57:23 GMT -4
Can we have this thread un-stickied? There doesn't seem to be any reason for it to have been made sticky in the first place. Ditto the other one.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 20, 2005 17:57:41 GMT -4
I've got a question.
If the PLSS was so efficient, then why do SCUBA divers still take down those massive oxygen tanks?
Why don't they just take down some small enclosed system which turns CO2 back into oxygen like they did on the Apollo missions allowing an indefinite stay?
(Answer- because there is no such thing)
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 19, 2005 20:13:02 GMT -4
Wow, Otherwise STFU. I mean that in the nicest possible way. Wankers. Intelligent debate, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 19, 2005 5:21:34 GMT -4
Thank you to everyone who supports free speech. You can't have a moon hoax board/section asking people to post theories and then ban them or call them a troll for expressing opinions they have been asked to articulate. So you would think. It's been fascinating to watch these threads from a distance and watch the exact same tactics being deployed by the regulars on the board- the relentless bombardment with highly technical questions, followed by the suggestion that it is "trolling" to fail to answer any of this tidal wave of questions, the thinly veiled threats of banning, the continual ad hominem attacks and all..... I will just say in Lunar Orbit's defence that despite his obvious lack of impartialiity, he does seem to realise that BAUT has done itself no favours by banning you in the eyes of the objective and open-minded observer, and I doubt he will make the same mistake himself.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 18, 2005 16:55:00 GMT -4
As I am here this evening, I will just add that I also read BAUT's board, and have therefore seen the saga of Moon Man's thread, and the sorry and shameful actions of BAUT's administration unfolding.
You have to wonder what kind of a "truth" it is, that can only be preserved by silencing anyone who questions it.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 18, 2005 13:40:17 GMT -4
Just to clarify for MM's sake in particular - margamatix was never banned, despite ignoring many detailed refutations of his claims. He just faded away. I think he was lost trying to drive through the impenetrable Van Allen English Channel (should have plated his truck with 6 feet of lead!). I read every message posted, but decided to stop posting when Lunar Orbit wrote this little gem.... .The decision to ban someone is entirely up to the administrator. It won't always be fair. I will take a user's past behaviour into account when they break a rule... if they made 1000 posts without breaking a rule and then suddenly went crazy and broke all of them I might let them off the hook with a warning. On the other hand, if I don't like someone and they break one minor rule I might use that as an excuse to ban them. I'm not interested in posting to a forum where the rules are applied according to whether the moderator "likes" the person who posts the message, particularly since "likeable", in this case is simply a very thinly-veiled euphemism to describe those who share the administrator's opinions. I will continue to read postings on this forum with interest, but will be taking no further part in the debate.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 27, 2005 18:49:53 GMT -4
Oh, believe me there will be a result................
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Nov 27, 2005 16:42:28 GMT -4
Right. So the laws of physics as they were understood in the summer of 1969 and had been for decades were re-written after Apollo 11?
Suppose NASA told you they had invented a perpetual-motion machine which could create energy? Would you believe them?
|
|