|
Post by photobuster919 on Jul 7, 2011 13:29:34 GMT -4
Anyone seen Jarrah's video on Transformers 3 yet? www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBePaSJDflASeems Jarrah's obsession with the moon hoax theory has gone too far. The film was made for entertainment purposes and Jarrah makes it seem like it was produced as an offence against himself. He basically nit-picks at details and discusses the film (as if he believed) it was real facts. He also goes off-topic towards the end by speaking of the Apollo 1 fire. It was also funny towards the end when he spoke of Jerry Weng. If there's a conspiracy against Jarrah, he will certainly be the first to know. Again to let readers know I am NOT a HB. I just watch Jarrah's videos for entertainment value.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Jul 2, 2011 11:45:04 GMT -4
He blocked me a year ago, so I'm unable to ask the one question I would most like to ask him and every other hoaxer: What evidence, if any, would make you change your mind and accept the reality of the Apollo missions? He said in the BOA interview that he (like Kaysing) would believe the moon landings were real if he saw the objects like the lunar rover on the surface. But even if we gave him a telescope and allowed him to look he would just make up an excuse not to believe like every other HB. "Ooooh NASA could have sent an unmanned probe" is something along the lines of how Jarrah would respond. I will be curious to see the media's reaction if Jarrah does go to the TAM.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Jun 28, 2011 8:50:45 GMT -4
Ooooooo!!!! I might just go on the off chance he does. It would be well worth the journey to ask him some questions on camera, and watch him bumble and stutter his way through his attempt at answering them. I have some hard questions for him, that involve real science. Shush.......he lurks around here! He won't be going if he senses an ambush Considering the lengths Jarrah has gone in his so-called "search for the truth" I would not at all be surprised if he made a cameo at the TAM this year. It seems to become a stereotype that conspiracy theorists nowadays will go to such lengths to prove their (many years debunked) claims. Jarrah is the perfect example, travelling from Australia all the way to America that must be halfway across the planet. He will go wherever he can no matter how far or near if claims by experts like Plait upset him in any way (Eg Jarrah constantly brags over what Plait said about Kaysing). Phil Plait the man himself is too making an appearance this year and we all know that if Jarrah finds any statement on BadAstronomy that proves him wrong he will run to Plait and ask for an interview. It will be basically the same as last year if that happens because Plait will just turn away from Jarrah telling him the break is over. Jarrah needs to learn that these people simply don't have time to debate what they said and need to move on. Jarrah just refuses to accept when his claims have been debunked by experts in their fields, exactly the same reason he won't write up his work.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Jun 18, 2011 16:04:39 GMT -4
Well Jarrah did say in the Binall of America interview that his new website will have a link where people can request an interview with him for whatever reason. Request an interview with him? Who does he think is? Oprah? Can you provide a link to that video, as I'd like to hear him say it. I'm not ploughing through a radio interview with Jarrah. For the record, I formally request an interview with him, over a phone line. He can come here and arrange it with me. He mentions his new website from 6:30-7:00 in this video. www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHIIOwQHT0Q&feature=channel_video_titleBut if you do wish to have an interview with Jarrah, I'm sure you know what the result will be. As many have already said Jarrah's publicly committed himself and if he's convinced the moon landing was real, I will start believing in Santa Clause again.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Jun 14, 2011 13:20:08 GMT -4
It's interesting that Jarrah has interacted with some authorities/educated sources, usually to attempt to verify some tidbit he believes to be "incriminating". The answers are invariably out of context, misunderstood or misinterpreted by Jarrah. But he never follows up with a "so, based on this data, the Apollo missions must have been impossible, correct?" He fears this question to these authorities from whom he so liberally cherry picks. I would challenge him on this, being the "expert" he is, he would certainly be able to dissect the response. Right? I'd love to see an ambush interview on him... Well Jarrah did say in the Binall of America interview that his new website will have a link where people can request an interview with him for whatever reason. Maybe we could confront Jarrah himself and ask the questions directly. Just so long as we make sure to ask him about solar flares and why he won't join any forum site.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Jun 13, 2011 12:28:16 GMT -4
You say you're not a HB. However, you seem to believe that HBs should be free to criticise anyone, including accusing them of murder and fraud, and that someone else saying, "No, you're wrong about that, because...." is some sort of horribly cruel censorship. I am not a HB, I believe the moon landings happened. I believe that either side of the fence should be allowed criticise the other for one reason or another. This is not specifically biased towards those who doubt the Moon landings. What I do believe Jarrah had a right to criticise some of us for was making Ralph Rene's death out to be a time for celebration. But I believe Jarrah was wrong to accuse Windley of lying about his contact with Brian O' Leary. I never said it was ok for any HB to accuse anyone of murder. When I said Jarrah is unoriginal, I meant that in the sense that he believes the Apollo 1 crew when that was what Kaysing believed. I wasn't saying either of them were right.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Jun 13, 2011 12:21:13 GMT -4
So whatever is going on in the world of JW? He is awfully quiet compaed to a few years back. Ever since the Las Vegas and Sydney newspapers handed his backside back to him in a somewhat tanned fashion we just dont get the usual retasting of our breakfast bile from the misunderstood boofhead. He has released MoonRocks Revisited took long enough. But yeah the series is basically Jarrah rehashing everything from Exhibit D and having a batt back at Webb and others for their debunking of his material.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on May 1, 2011 6:14:03 GMT -4
But frankly, 'photobuster', I suggest you find another obsession... Or if you are seriously interested, pick your absolute favorite 'proof' of a hoax, and then have a go at defending it. If you are not interested in that... then I've got to say that your posts here look a little like Jarrah spam... And when did I say I think the moon landings were fake? I've said this in many of my earlier posts, I believe they were real but I don't agree with some criticisms made against HB's like Kaysing and Rene. I remember seeing one video about Kaysing and a person said in the summary "this person is dumb, autistic" and something along those lines. I find that insulting as I myself have AS and I take it vey personally if anyone says we are not intelligent. But for the hoax part I DO NOT BELIEVE in the conspiracy theories but I think the HB have a right to express their views.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on May 1, 2011 6:08:59 GMT -4
I found this video series on YouTube. I'm English, and as is the case with Percy, Allen makes me ashamed to be English. I cringe when ever I hear this sort of pseudo-intellectual waffle. It''s the usual rubbish if anyone want to sit through 2 hours of it. However, in Part 9, Allen is nicely challenged, and gives the usual 'radiation in space will fry everything' response. I actually found Allen quite defensive when he asked his challenger if he 'was sure?' I just want to clear up on one thing here. Marcuss believes the moon landings were fake but David Percy doesn't, he believe the footage was faked. Everyone assumes David Percy is a HB but he is not. And yes Allen is misled in his views about Apollo, but I guess at the end of the day thats just his opinion.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Apr 27, 2011 3:32:44 GMT -4
The moon hoax is pretty old hat and the media appear to have moved on. It will take a few years before we have a new generation of gullible people to sap for money to support the hoax proponents combined with a new generation of hoax proponents that can tap into the anxiety of the new generation. And I suppose you see this as evidence the media has moved on? www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20110403/moon-landing-conspiracists-110403/Quite frankly I've seen many written articles about the moon hoax but nothing on TV for the past 8 years.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Apr 25, 2011 17:34:23 GMT -4
Please no bashing, I don't believe Jarrah's claims but as we are all critics, I believe everyone on this forum can develop their own review about Jarrah as a filmmaker. Why should I care about him as a filmmaker? However good he may or may not be, he's spreading lies about history and science. He can like Ranma or not. I don't care. Jarrah as a person is singularly uninteresting to me. He is spreading what I percieve and what many more here percieve as incorrect history and science, but Jarrah has the right to argue his own claims. His Little Gem, Flagging The Gems and Apollo 1 videos have been restored to youtube by the modeterators who confirmed Jarrah's videos had no right to be banned. This shows that its better for us to respect Jarrah has his own opinion about the moon landings. I don't believe them myself but I think he has the right to talk about them.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Apr 25, 2011 15:00:05 GMT -4
The other week, "The Truth About The Moon Landings" aired on my local TV station. I watched it with my dad simply because he never knew much about the hoax theory until I became interested.
This and "Conspiracy Theories : Did We Land On The Moon" are the best documentaries I've ever seen detailing the hoax and the two sides.
I was wondering what are the odds of another moon hoax documentary coming out on TV in the near future? I would be interested to see a new one with Jarrah, Sibrel, Plait etc (for or against I don't mind).
And just for the record I do believe Apollo but I would just like to see another show documenting the hoax, for more recent audiences.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Apr 25, 2011 14:49:29 GMT -4
This is a topic for general discussion about our main opponent on the hoax movement Jarrah White. I would like to state a few of my own opinions on Jarrah.
1. Jarrah is unoriginal. He has few new pieces of evidence supporting the hoax theory. Most of his videos are reiterating claims made by other HB's
2. Jarrah makes interesting points about cyberbullying and trolling. I am not a HB but I do agree that Windley goes too far with his criticism's of Kaysing etc.
3. Jarrah is a smart man when you really listen to him. He may not believe the truth about Apollo but he has a good knowledge of the space travel era, the Cold War and NASA
4. He may not have great maths skills but he's an excellent reader and brilliant at picking out good quotes to use
5. Jarrah seems to have other talents, eg acting, drawing Ranma etc.
6. Yes I do believe he genuinely mourns the fallen astronauts of the Apollo 1 fire
7. Good taste in music, eg Oasis, Faith Hill
8. He also likes anime, thats really cool
9. He appears to have some form of autism. I don't mean that in a bad way as I have AS so I know it is more of a good thing for many people
Please no bashing, I don't believe Jarrah's claims but as we are all critics, I believe everyone on this forum can develop their own review about Jarrah as a filmmaker. Anything else I missed out on, feel free to add anything on.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Apr 3, 2011 8:23:27 GMT -4
Now that I think about it this moon rocks special may actually turn out to be Jarrah's ultimate downfall.
Remember Jarrah falsely claimed early in the Radioactive Anomoly II video that a growing number of people were no longer believing the Moon Landings as his videos got more views than Phil Plaits.
This as we know is refutable just as all Jarrah's other false claims about his videos.
If he actually goes ahead and posts an 8-hour documentary he will see the numbe of us watching his videos will go down as few will be willing to sit through the entire film.
When that day comes Jarrah will need to rethink his claim about a "growing" number of HB and then he will start to realise the huge inaccuracy of the ajority of his hoax claims.
Even Kaysing came out and admitted he believed the Moon Landings, one day Jarrah will come around too.
|
|
|
Post by photobuster919 on Feb 21, 2011 10:53:24 GMT -4
Maybe Jarrah realises he's lost the fight with Jay. I think there was only one person who saw it as a fight, and it wasn't Jay. I've kind of noticed he's gotten over his obsession with Windley. He's now all about Plait and Astrobrant. He's past Astrobrant, and moved on to Phil Webb now. He's releasing an 8 hour rebuttal to a criticism that Phil made about Jarrah's 'NASA faked the moon rock claims.' After the handing down he received from Phil, it appears Jarrah is going for volume to swamp his critics out of the game, and then claim his victory. Apparently his new series is peer reviewed, but the source of review remains anonymous. He thinks that this review answers those that challenge him to have his work properly peer reviewed. The challenge remains. Jarrah should write up his work and submit it to independent referees in relevent fields, and those referees should be mutually agreed by those that sit on both sides of the fence. He knows that his little world will be torn apart if he dares take up that challenge, and simply does not have the bottle to do it. While he carries on with his facade to prop up his ego and need to 'pwn' people, he'll be nothing more than YouTube's version of a Victorian freak show. Apparently he doesn't believe that quality is better than quantity. 8 hours of documentary sounds ludicrous to me. Each part is like 10 mins long so that would mean he's aiming for 48 individual videos to cover the broader topic. That would even stomp his radioactive anomoly series, which I thought took forever. I would be interested to know how many users will actually sit and watch through the whole series in one go. I'm sure there's more reason as to why Jarrah's waiting to post all the videos at once rather than perfection.
|
|