|
Post by Bill Thompson on Mar 3, 2006 11:40:31 GMT -4
I wonder if there is some hard evidence that could be shown to a hard-core hoax believer. What I am talking about is what I have mentioned before. The information about all the radio telescopes that followed the Apollo 11 mission. I wonder where I can get details about this evidence.
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Mar 3, 2006 21:07:57 GMT -4
There are a couple of people on the board that know alot about this, the main one I think is Peter B? Have a look at his threads. From what I have seen, most HB's simply ignore it, say that NASA figured out a way to fool them, or claim that the tracking stations were in on the whole thing too.
|
|
|
Post by mid on Mar 4, 2006 14:25:34 GMT -4
I wonder if there is some hard evidence that could be shown to a hard-core hoax believer. What I am talking about is what I have mentioned before. The information about all the radio telescopes that followed the Apollo 11 mission. I wonder where I can get details about this evidence. The material concerning Apollo is not considered, or has ever been viewed as "evidence" in support of the program. Rather, it is scientific and engineeering documentation and analysis of something that alot of people spent alot of time actually doing. However, none of that completely substantiated and voluminous material will ever be considered as "proof" by the typical HB. This includes telemetry data, which no HB would be able to understand anyway. If you're trying to shut them up or convince them that their skewed and scientifically illiterate concepts are just that, you're in for an endeavor that will take time, and patience, and will, upojn the presentation of irrefutable scientific fact, eventually succeed...in shutting them up. But this is not because you've convinced them (it requires some modicum of scientific literacy and intellectual honesty to understand and be convinced). It is because they cannot defend their positions anymore and are looking for other angles to attack from.Beyond a certain point, it is a waste of time.
|
|