rocky
Earth
BANNED
Posts: 212
|
Post by rocky on Jun 1, 2007 15:57:53 GMT -4
You people are being very simplistic. There's nothing wrong with citing other examples of dishonesty in the government when my argument is about dishonesty in the government when it comes to Apollo.
The viewers are watching and judging.
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Jun 1, 2007 16:04:45 GMT -4
You probably mean that the readers are watching and judging. This isn't primarily a picture or video site, so "readers" is the more appropriate term.
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Jun 1, 2007 17:21:36 GMT -4
You people are being very simplistic. There's nothing wrong with citing other examples of dishonesty in the government when my argument is about dishonesty in the government when it comes to Apollo. The viewers are watching and judging. There is no connection at all between Apollo and 9/11, therefore it is off topic to discuss 9/11 in the Apollo section. What about that don't you understand? If I tell you something is off topic then it's off topic, end of discussion. Ignoring my warnings is what got you banned, and you're heading towards another (more permanent) banishment.
|
|
rocky
Earth
BANNED
Posts: 212
|
Post by rocky on Jun 1, 2007 17:35:27 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Jun 1, 2007 17:48:00 GMT -4
Now that's all a matter of perspective. And, in your case, biasedness. What are you trying to say? You were temporarily banned for wrong reasons?
|
|
Jason
Pluto
May all your hits be crits
Posts: 5,579
|
Post by Jason on Jun 1, 2007 17:48:14 GMT -4
This site is considered to be a government damage-control site by people who do serious study of the moon hoax theory. No matter how many times I hear that it never gets more believable.
|
|
rocky
Earth
BANNED
Posts: 212
|
Post by rocky on Jun 1, 2007 17:55:13 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Jun 1, 2007 18:03:19 GMT -4
Injustice? What a joke. Please spare me your sob story, I have treated you far more fairly than you deserve. Every post you have made is still here for everyone to see. If your claims had any credibility at all don't you think I would have deleted them by now? I'm certain "the viewers" can see quite clearly that your claims are not based on facts or logic.
Your inability to follow simple rules is what got you a temporary banishment. Keep it up and it will be permanent.
|
|
|
Post by Data Cable on Jun 1, 2007 18:08:35 GMT -4
If you can't deal with an issue, you have to get rid of it. Ummm, if "we" got rid of it... why is it still here?
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Jun 1, 2007 18:19:07 GMT -4
Then why is it still there? You're a moron. If I wanted to get rid of something that you said it would be gone. And yet I allow you to continue posting. Don't you think that if I was trying to block you I would have banned you permanently? It is technically impossible for me to prevent you from accessing public sections of the forum without banning you completely. I don't have that kind of control over the forum software. If you are too stupid to understand that then I will not bother trying to explain it to you. You were given the most likely reason why you are having trouble staying connected. Go ask the manager of the internet cafe if that explanation makes sense. Ask him if the cafe blocks cookies. Go ahead. And it's likely becoming increasingly clear to them, as it is to me, that you are an idiot who doesn't even understand that internet cookies control your login state, so how could you possibly understand the science involved in going (or not going) to the moon?
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Post by Bob B. on Jun 1, 2007 19:17:34 GMT -4
This site is considered to be a government damage-control site by... hoax believers. ...people who do serious study of the moon hoax theory. are not hoax believers.
|
|
|
Post by sts60 on Jun 1, 2007 21:07:36 GMT -4
Every time an injustice is committed, some more of your credibility is lost.Begging the question. The consensus is that there was no injustice; just a poster with too little self-control to heed the administrator's warning not to post non-Apollo material in an Apollo forum. This site is considered to be a government damage-control siteThis site is owned by a private individual (LunarOrbit), who has AFAIK no connection to the U.S. government. No one here, AFAIK, posts at the behest of said government, and many of the regulars here are not even Americans; we are all here on our own dime. Provide evidence for this accusation, or retract it. by people who do serious study of the moon hoax theory. Incorrect. The quality of work done by the hoax believers is abysmal and clearly the result of incompetent "study", except when it is clearly the result of deliberate distortion and falsification - as Sibrel, Percy, et al have been shown to do. Like I said--the viewers are watching and judging.Actually, they're laughing. But any of "the viewers" are encouraged to chime in with their thoughts. This guy explains how a lot of people feel abot this site. apollohoax.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=theories&action=display&thread=1177113447 He spouted a lot of insults and baseless accusations. He sounded like a peevish 12-year-old. I for one will not lose much sleep over the blatherings of peevish 12-year-olds. This is how I feel too.Yes, we know. Everybody who doesn't agree with you is deluded or corrupt or a NASA/CIA/NSA/Illuminati disinformation agent. Hey, whatever comforts you in lieu of actually being able to discuss the subject intelligently, or address the detailed explanations and rebuttals to your endless handwaving.
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Jun 1, 2007 21:22:39 GMT -4
I will make the same invitation to Rocky that I made to Margamatix: If you don't like the way I run this forum then feel free to start your own. You can prove to me that you treat the Apollo supporters more fairly than I treat the hoax believers. Well, I'm a Canadian who lives less than 100km from the nearest US border crossing, but who hasn't crossed the border in probably 15 years (never as an adult). I have voted for the Liberals in every federal election since I turned 18 (13 years ago), so I think that makes me about as undesirable to the current US administration as a Canadian can get.
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Jun 2, 2007 1:34:00 GMT -4
You know, now I think about it, if I were a NASA disinformation agent, wouldn't it be in the government's best interests to keep me happy? And wouldn't keeping my boyfriend out of a warzone be part of keeping me happy?
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Jun 2, 2007 5:29:33 GMT -4
So how about addressing those points we made in those threads, rocky?
|
|