|
Post by lionking on Nov 4, 2006 12:57:01 GMT -4
the maximum prophecy I heard about on 9/11 that I am quiet sure it happened is an astrologist that delivers her predictons everyday here on TV . At the 10th of september, she said :tomorrow there will be something in the U.S. The interviewer said this on New Year's eve and reminded ppl of what the astrologist said at that day specifically, but I actually forgot. Other predictions, if I am not mistaken the rumour that Nostradamus said that two hard bodies will hit two high towers, turned out to be rumours only, as far as I know.
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Nov 4, 2006 17:47:46 GMT -4
The strongest evidence I know of in regard to psychic predictions for 9/11 is that Sylvia Brown was on Larry King Live on the evening of 9/10 and prattled on about the happenings in callers lives but said not a peep about any disaster. I guess knowing about the forthcoming death of thousands of people is just out of her area of expertise.
|
|
|
Post by PeterB on Nov 7, 2006 0:49:55 GMT -4
911:Inside Job said:
This *might* explain why Australian petrol prices increased from about $1.00/litre to about $1.50/litre up to a couple of months ago. But it doesn't explain why they've dropped back to abour $1.10/litre in the last couple of months.
Also, would you care to comment on how increasing demand for oil from India and China would affect the price of oil around the world?
|
|
|
Post by PeterB on Nov 7, 2006 0:54:41 GMT -4
Other predictions, if I am not mistaken the rumour that Nostradamus said that two hard bodies will hit two high towers, turned out to be rumours only, as far as I know. urbanlegends.about.com/cs/historical/a/nostradamus.htmThe quatrain which supposedly contains a prediction by Nostradamus of the September 11 attack is a hoax. It was written by students about 10 years ago for an essay.
|
|
|
Post by bazbear on Nov 15, 2006 4:46:29 GMT -4
In the last few months, here in the USA there has been a wide spread CT that the quickly dropping gasoline prices were being engineered by the oil companies and/or powers-that-be to help Republicans win in the elections. We see how well that worked! (not that I believe it was even remotely true)
|
|
|
Post by phunk on Nov 17, 2006 13:46:57 GMT -4
Might have helped if they got it down to the levels it was at when we had a democrat president. It's still a dollar/gallon more than pre-bush prices.
|
|
|
Post by gktm300 on Dec 9, 2006 17:53:58 GMT -4
CHECK THIS OUT www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1753.cfmWOW WHAT A COINCIDENCE? YOU GUYS PROBABLY THINK WE ARE ALONE IN THE UNIVERSE THATS INFIN ITE BUT THE POSSIBLITIES ARE FINITE i got a bride in brooklyn for sale
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Dec 9, 2006 20:36:05 GMT -4
i got a bride in brooklyn for sale
Is she good looking?
|
|
|
Post by 911: Inside Job on Feb 9, 2007 18:21:53 GMT -4
Here's an update to the original story: Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped PopulationIn the article, elitist Rockefeller admits to Russo that the War on Terror is a hoax: Russo states that Rockefeller told him, "Eleven months before 9/11 happened there was going to be an event and out of that event we were going to invade Afghanistan to run pipelines through the Caspian sea, we were going to invade Iraq to take over the oil fields and establish a base in the Middle East, and we'd go after Chavez in Venezuela."
Rockefeller also told Russo that he would see soldiers looking in caves in Afghanistan and Pakistan for Osama bin Laden and that there would be an "Endless war on terror where there's no real enemy and the whole thing is a giant hoax," so that "the government could take over the American people," according to Russo, who said that Rockefeller was cynically laughing and joking as he made the astounding prediction.Nothing to worry about here folks, just go back to sleep.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Feb 9, 2007 18:47:12 GMT -4
So basically you drop by every few months to seagull post then never stick around to discuss anything? Seems like you need to wake up. In the real world people discuss things.
|
|
|
Post by smb on Feb 10, 2007 15:34:29 GMT -4
So what does Nicholas Rockefeller have to say about it. Has he confirmed the story? I doubt it. Lots of people were making dire predictions year 2000 onwards. Here is Paul Wolfowitz in June 2001: www.liveleak.com/view?i=bf6197a44d
|
|
|
Post by 911: Inside Job on Feb 10, 2007 15:50:38 GMT -4
So basically you drop by every few months to seagull post then never stick around to discuss anything? Seems like you need to wake up. In the real world people discuss things. Responses like this are why I don't stick around to "discuss". The best I can do is try to wake up a few lurkers. Most posters here have a knee-jerk reaction to conspiracy theories, regardless of the evidence, unless they are stamped as "official" by the government. For example, some people would rather believe the Warren Commission's "magic bullet" theory of the Kennedy assassination, despite its absurdity, just because it's the officially sanctioned theory. Same goes for 9-11.
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Feb 10, 2007 16:44:19 GMT -4
Only JFK conspiracy theorists still think there is anything magical about the so-called "magic bullet". The seating arrangement in the limo allowed the bullet to travel in a straight line, this has been demonstrated using 3D models. Earlier 2D diagrams had the seating arrangement wrong, hence the wacky path the bullet would have had to follow. Of course it doesn't matter how many times this is explained, conspiracy theorists will always continue to use the "magic bullet" as evidence of a conspiracy.
|
|
|
Post by 911: Inside Job on Feb 10, 2007 16:58:44 GMT -4
Only JFK conspiracy theorists still think there is anything magical about the so-called "magic bullet". The seating arrangement in the limo allowed the bullet to travel in a straight line, this has been demonstrated using 3D models. Earlier 2D diagrams had the seating arrangement wrong, hence the wacky path the bullet would have had to follow. Of course it doesn't matter how many times this is explained, conspiracy theorists will always continue to use the "magic bullet" as evidence of a conspiracy. This is OT, but come on. The magic bullet was "pristine". Hardly a mark on it even though it was allegedly deflected by bone a few times. The bullet was obviously placed on the gurney. Kennedy was killed by a frontal shot from the grassy knoll. The large rear exit wound was covered up in the falsified autopsy photos.
|
|
|
Post by gillianren on Feb 10, 2007 17:18:13 GMT -4
Tell that to the doctors both at Parkland and who performed the autopsy. They universally agree in a shot from the rear.
And no, the "magic bullet" wasn't "pristine." However, it was in approximately the same condition as one I saw fired through about a yard of wood. Also one I saw fired through simulations of Kennedy and Connally. Ballistics experts are comfortable with this evidence; why aren't you?
Actually, it's amazing how conspiracy theorists assume that all experts are fooled or lying or whatnot. And it's vastly entertaining when they claim that they're being "pressured to keep quiet," given how long really vocal conspiracy theorists live.
|
|