Post by Jason Thompson on Sept 30, 2005 9:16:59 GMT -4
Did he? Well then I'll have to stand corrected. Like I have said, about a dozen times now, I haven't read Bart Sibrel's claim and so am not qualified to comment on it.
Margamatix you are either incompetent or a liar. How can you claim you have not read Sibrel's claim about manned hours in space when you cut and pasted it into your earlier post?
But once again I am forced to ask: what does the thorough debunking of one of Sibrel's claims, as conducted by me via personal e-mail exchange with him and minimal online research, say to you about his honesty, integrity and competence as a researcher? I'm not asking if it debunks his other claims, but doesn't it even cast a shadow of doubt in your mind, that he could get something so easy to verify so utterly wrong? Even if his other points were valid, doesn't including such an obvious turkey undermine his credibility just a tad?
Margamatix you are either incompetent or a liar. How can you claim you have not read Sibrel's claim about manned hours in space when you cut and pasted it into your earlier post?
But once again I am forced to ask: what does the thorough debunking of one of Sibrel's claims, as conducted by me via personal e-mail exchange with him and minimal online research, say to you about his honesty, integrity and competence as a researcher? I'm not asking if it debunks his other claims, but doesn't it even cast a shadow of doubt in your mind, that he could get something so easy to verify so utterly wrong? Even if his other points were valid, doesn't including such an obvious turkey undermine his credibility just a tad?