|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Jan 21, 2012 19:47:17 GMT -4
You obviously haven't given it enough thought then.
|
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Jan 21, 2012 20:31:33 GMT -4
Let me add another contradiction and see if you agree or not. In "The Smoking Gun of Bart's "Smoking Gun" Footag" thread you wrote. I have a theory that I think must be correct....They put the astronauts for 11 in 9 or 10 and then they have the mock footage. So you are contending that Apollo 11 footage was faked on Apollo 10. But Apollo 10 went to the moon. If it could go to the moon,then there is nothing to stop Apollo 11 from going. |
|
|
|
Post by Ranb on Jan 21, 2012 22:03:35 GMT -4
The only contradictions that I have been able to find are with the official story. since that cannot be right. The hoax must be true. What contradictions would those be? How do you decide what "evidence" to believe? Do you only believe what supports your conclusions? Ranb |
|
|
|
Post by chrlz on Jan 22, 2012 0:17:09 GMT -4
Allow me to provide a full, comprehensive rebuttal of all the points you have comprehensively researched & thoughtfully raised, fttoia.
-
There you go - I covered every one. Job done.
And.. welcome back.
|
|
|
|
Post by twik on Jan 22, 2012 20:24:48 GMT -4
The only contradictions are with the official story? You've not noticed that there are a number of contradictory versions of the hoax theory, all fervently believed by someone, that cannot all be true?
OK- please tell us what *your* complete, coherent story is of how the landings were faked. It has to hang together, and there can be no contradictory evidence against any point.
Take your time - we'll wait.
|
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Jan 23, 2012 1:40:46 GMT -4
I won't be holding my breath.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Thompson on Jan 23, 2012 7:56:14 GMT -4
The only contradictions that I have been able to find are with the official story. since that cannot be right. The hoax must be true. I can only assume you are pulling our collective leg on that one, given that the previous thirty pages are of nothing but contradictions in the hoax theory. |
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Jan 23, 2012 7:57:51 GMT -4
The only contradictions that I have been able to find are with the official story. since that cannot be right. The hoax must be true. You go first then. On your list, the top contradiction is? |
|
|
|
Post by forthethrillofital on Jan 23, 2012 15:13:39 GMT -4
The only contradictions that I have been able to find are with the official story. since that cannot be right. The hoax must be true. You go first then. On your list, the top contradiction is? When interviewed in 1970 Armstrong said he was certain there would be moon bases established in his lifetime. If that is not a contradiction and moreover a joke of a statement, I do not know what is. |
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Jan 23, 2012 15:17:30 GMT -4
You go first then. On your list, the top contradiction is? When interviewed in 1970 Armstrong said he was certain there would be moon bases established in his lifetime. If that is not a contradiction and moreover a joke of a statement, I do not know what is. How is this contradictory? It was wrong (given the proviso that he's not finished his lifetime yet), but what did it contradict? In 1970, the Apollo program was still well underway, and the belief was that despite the cancellation of several of the later missions, that new and longer missions would be created, leading to exploration of Mars by the late 1990's. US Government policy on funding stopped that, and instead NASA ended up with the shuttle, which was pretty useless as far as exploration was concerned. Besides, Armstrong isn't dead yet, and had Obama not killed it, we'd now be seeing the first steps back to the moon and the building of a Base by 2020, so even with the delay created by the shuttle, there could have been a moon base established in Neil's lifetime, and if the Chinese keep going the way they plan, who knows, they might do it in his lifetime too. |
|
raven
Jupiter
That ain't Earth, kiddies.
Posts: 509
|
Post by raven on Jan 23, 2012 16:37:02 GMT -4
forthethrillofital:There is a difference been simply wrong and a contradiction. A contradiction would be if he later said, "I think moon bases are will never be built and I never said otherwise." even if a moon base went up the next day. Heck, even if he later said "I was wrong in my previous statement about there being one in my lifetime." that's also not a contradiction, that's just changing ones mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Jan 23, 2012 17:59:44 GMT -4
You go first then. On your list, the top contradiction is? When interviewed in 1970 Armstrong said he was certain there would be moon bases established in his lifetime. If that is not a contradiction and moreover a joke of a statement, I do not know what is. I have to ask if you are serious or joking. As a proof or contradiction, that does not even get over the doorstep of whatever temple you are using for the denial. Can you can do better than that? Be interesting to see what he actually said, seeing as his name has been used to bend the truth with regards his quotes before. |
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Jan 23, 2012 20:15:30 GMT -4
When interviewed in 1970 Armstrong said he was certain there would be moon bases established in his lifetime. If that is not a contradiction and moreover a joke of a statement, I do not know what is. Oh, don't be absurd...Armstrong not being able to "predict the future" is meaningless. A lot of people thought we'd have Moon Bases by now... so what?? Do you have an actual argument to make, or will it be more of this "type" of stuff?? |
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Jan 23, 2012 20:21:31 GMT -4
When interviewed in 1970 Armstrong said he was certain there would be moon bases established in his lifetime. If that is not a contradiction and moreover a joke of a statement, I do not know what is. This is just trolling. |
|
|
|
Post by laurel on Jan 23, 2012 21:35:58 GMT -4
What else should we expect from a sock puppet? |
|
