|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 14, 2005 4:45:28 GMT -4
I'm pleased that we can dispense with the rubbish that you don't believe in. Now would you care to explain the rubbish you do believe in? While i understand that insults and ridicule are standard methods employed by Moon Delusionists, I'm afraid they simply flag up your lack of any evidence whatsoever that the Moon landings actually happened. |
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 13, 2005 20:43:15 GMT -4
I have read statements on the Net about the deaths of Grissom, Chafee and White, suggesting that their deaths were deliberate. I do not agree with this, and find these statements distasteful.
I have also read statements suggesting that the Apollo landings were real, but were manipulated in order to conceal the presence of aliens from another planet, found on the moon.
I hope we can all dismiss the fantasists who cling to our shirt-tails and that we can carry on debating Apollo in an adult manner.
|
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 18:12:33 GMT -4
Well, I think scenario 1 will start the ball rolling and then the whole house of cards will come tumbling down, if you'll excuse the mixed metaphor!
|
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 17:52:38 GMT -4
I think that's reasonable criteria.My personal belief is that scenario 1 will occur at some stage.
|
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 17:22:33 GMT -4
Hello Dave and welcome along.
I have said before that I would take the word of an astronaut for it and I am going to ask Buzz Aldrin when he visits the UK later this year if I can.
But if this projected Russian mission happens, I will accept that Apollo was for real too.
What would it take to convince you that it did not happen?
|
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 17:31:51 GMT -4
I *am* a layman, but I believed in it for over 30 years so I can hardly be described as "predisposed". In fact, belief in the moon landings is the predisposition.
I do enjoy your comments Jay, but nobody forces you either to read my postings or reply to them. You could ignore me if you wanted.
My comments are here for anyone to read and judge for themselves.
|
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 17:13:48 GMT -4
Here's my design for the lunar craft  |
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 16:42:54 GMT -4
Be specific; I do not accept vague handwaving. Can I just point out that this is the internet and nobody asked you to decide what is acceptable and not? |
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 16:13:54 GMT -4
The space ship will be different from the Apollo ones Well, it will be if it goes anywhere near the moon. |
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 15:41:37 GMT -4
The Soviets sent live organisms around the moon in 1968. They know it's not fatal to do so. So all we need now is a turtle with $100 million to spare.............  |
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 15:10:55 GMT -4
Because that's what Russia say would happen if you sent a man to the moon. I like your avatar by the way- especially the bright bit where Buzz is standing.  |
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 15:05:07 GMT -4
Yeah, I don't think the Russians will push Sibrel out either, but we can hope. The Russians won't push him out, not least because by the time they got into moon orbit, they would have been dead for three days. |
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 12, 2005 13:36:53 GMT -4
It won't happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 9, 2005 17:08:28 GMT -4
None of these authors has been within ten miles of an aerospace company. It is absolutely ludicrous to think they would know what the document controls in such an operate would be like. Most of them try to extrapolate from what it takes to build a lawn mower or a house or some other straightforward item, and they get it very wrong. Thank you. I got the information - "Yes, it is bizarre that the FBI destroyed all the blueprints of the Saturn rockets and Apollo spacecraft. Yes, it is unbelievable that NASA ordered Ken Johnston to destroy all the duplicate sets of Apollo photography, essentially trying to confine the control of the visual record to one set of prints that NASA could manipulate. " - from this site.... www.lunaranomalies.com/fake-moon.htmwhose authors, Michael Bara and Steve Troy, claim that the Apollo landings DID happen. In light of what you say, I will dismiss them as idiots. |
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 9, 2005 16:02:30 GMT -4
blue·print
n.
1. A contact print of a drawing or other image rendered as white lines on a blue background, especially such a print of an architectural plan or technical drawing. Also called cyanotype.
2. A mechanical drawing produced by any of various similar photographic processes, such as one that creates blue or black lines on a white background.
3. A detailed plan of action.
4. A model or prototype.
Did you not understand the question?
|
|
