|
Post by nomuse on Oct 1, 2005 16:38:27 GMT -4
The English Major raises his hand:
I think Margamatix may have won that round. "Stupidly" obstinate is a description in which inferior mentation leads inclination. That is to say; "he's obstinate because he's too stupid to know better."
"Muleish" would be better, as the defining anecdotal characteristic of the mule (besides sterility) is stubborness.
|
|
|
Post by nomuse on Oct 1, 2005 16:39:46 GMT -4
We've already provided everything you've requested. If it's not good enough for you then there is nothing more for you to accomplish here. It seems the sensible thing for you to do is just go away. Sorry Bob, that cheap appeal simply won't wash. It didn't happen, and I have provided you with bucketloads of evidence that it didn't happen. If you don't want me here on the ApolloHoax forum pointing out that Apollo was hoaxed, then I suggest you send a private message to Admin asking that my account be deleted. Otherwise, I suggest you continue to read with an open mind, the evidence I present to you. I have followed every link you provided and looked closely at every photograph you showed. Can you possibly claim you have returned the favor, and looked at MY evidence?
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Post by Bob B. on Oct 1, 2005 16:44:01 GMT -4
It didn't happen, and I have provided you with bucketloads of evidence that it didn't happen. No you have not. You've only shown your gullibility and willful ignorance. If you don't want me here on the ApolloHoax forum pointing out that Apollo was hoaxed, then I suggest you send a private message to Admin asking that my account be deleted. I have been advocating your bannshment from this forum for weeks but everyone else seems to want to keep you around for the entertainment value. I think you're a troll and rude. If you do eventually get banned I may be the first to say, "I told you so". (though PhantomWolf may beat me to it.) Otherwise, I suggest you continue to read with an open mind, the evidence I present to you. I have done that and my open mind tells me that your evidence is rubbish.
|
|
Al Johnston
"Cheer up!" they said, "It could be worse!" So I did, and it was.
Posts: 1,453
|
Post by Al Johnston on Oct 1, 2005 16:46:04 GMT -4
There's a hole in his bucket...
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Oct 1, 2005 16:49:16 GMT -4
Can you possibly claim you have returned the favor, and looked at MY evidence? I read every message posted and try to examine all of the evidence presented to me.However, because of my job, my family and other commitments, it's quite possible that I have not examined the evidence that you have offered. If this is the case, then I apologise. I can only deal with so many people at once, but the name "nomuse" is one I will look out for from now on, so you can be assured that I will reply personally to any message you post in the future. I do not ignore anybody, but you must appreciate that I cannot possibly reply to everybody who asks a question of me.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Oct 1, 2005 16:50:54 GMT -4
I have been advocating your bannshment from this forum for weeks . Well thanks for that Bob, you're in the same box as Kiwi now. Bye!
|
|
|
Post by nomuse on Oct 1, 2005 16:53:51 GMT -4
Hey, hey...put me in the box too!
A little more work, and we can make it happen that Margamatix is the first poster to banish a forum!
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Oct 1, 2005 17:04:00 GMT -4
Hey, hey...put me in the box too! As requested, done.
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Post by Bob B. on Oct 1, 2005 17:04:26 GMT -4
Well thanks for that Bob, you're in the same box as Kiwi now. Bye! This means little since my refutations really aren't directed at margamatix anyway. That would be equivalent to talking to a brick wall. I post for people who want to listen and learn and enjoy having an intelligent discourse. For those people I will continue to post.
|
|
|
Post by LunarOrbit on Oct 1, 2005 17:24:15 GMT -4
And I thank you for that, Bob. One post from you is worth more than a million from Margamatix.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Oct 1, 2005 17:25:40 GMT -4
It didn't happen, and I have provided you with bucketloads of evidence that it didn't happen. Evidence? Hah! LOLOLOL I've seen plenty of conjecture and hadwaving from your side but nothing consisting of evidence. If you don't want me here on the ApolloHoax forum pointing out that Apollo was hoaxed, then I suggest you send a private message to Admin asking that my account be deleted. That's what you've wanted all along isn't it? Then you can go back to your friends and claim "the truth is being suppressed. Look how they banned me. etc." I'm really doubting that you came here for any other reason than to engage in your "scambaiting". The problem is you have to find a scam first. Why don't you go hang out at the hollow earth boards? I'm also doubting that you ever really believed in the moon landings. Your mind is too shut and you've been way too pigheaded. Why don't you stop with that lie right now? Otherwise, I suggest you continue to read with an open mind, the evidence I present to you. Again, present some evidence and we'll be happy to look at it but you haven't had any yet. Am I the only one that finds it ironic that the one here being obstinate and pigheaded is the one calling for us to have an open mind?
|
|
Al Johnston
"Cheer up!" they said, "It could be worse!" So I did, and it was.
Posts: 1,453
|
Post by Al Johnston on Oct 1, 2005 17:35:42 GMT -4
Bertrand Russell's dictum comes to mind...
|
|
|
Post by Mr Gorsky on Oct 1, 2005 18:07:23 GMT -4
Just a couple of observations Margamatix from someone who hasn't really got involved in these debates except to read them all.
Firstly, in order for anything you produce her to be considered "evidence" it must at least demonstrate what you claim that it does. Producing a video clip and saying that it is "obvious that it shows this", when several other board members can clearly explain the reasons why it doesn't show that is not evidence, no matter how many times you repeat the original claim.
Second, a very wise (fictional) character once said ... while all answers are replies, not all replies are answers.
I suggest you bear that in mind when you are accused of not having answered the questions asked of you. When you receive a long and comprehensive response, debunking one of your arguments, simply restating your original argument is not and answer ... though it is a reply.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Oct 1, 2005 18:16:12 GMT -4
Just a couple of observations Margamatix from someone who hasn't really got involved in these debates except to read them all. Firstly, in order for anything you produce her to be considered "evidence" it must at least demonstrate what you claim that it does. Producing a video clip and saying that it is "obvious that it shows this", when several other board members can clearly explain the reasons why it doesn't show that is not evidence, no matter how many times you repeat the original claim. Second, a very wise (fictional) character once said ... while all answers are replies, not all replies are answers. I suggest you bear that in mind when you are accused of not having answered the questions asked of you. When you receive a long and comprehensive response, debunking one of your arguments, simply restating your original argument is not and answer ... though it is a reply. Please just read what I have to say with an open mind. By the way, the answer to your signature is 42. But then you knew that already!
|
|
|
Post by jones on Oct 1, 2005 18:28:07 GMT -4
I think the answer to your signature IS IN FACT 42. Putting bold text in front of my answer makes it fact regardless of whether or not I present any real evidence on the subject.
Ok, so it's really 54, but I get the reference.
|
|