|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 20:17:03 GMT -4
Post by Moon Man on Apr 20, 2006 20:17:03 GMT -4
But the people with "no time" for research to back up their claims are so often the ones who have plenty of time to churn out dozens of new claims. Funny how that works The people who have little to say usally talk the most, and the people who have the most to say usally talk very little. Not me though. I have lots to say, and if your going to say it, you might as well say it to the world.
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 20:33:32 GMT -4
Post by Bob B. on Apr 20, 2006 20:33:32 GMT -4
Not me though. I have lots to say You should concentrate more on quality rather than quantity.
|
|
reynoldbot
Jupiter
A paper-white mask of evil.
Posts: 790
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 20:37:34 GMT -4
Post by reynoldbot on Apr 20, 2006 20:37:34 GMT -4
What the hell does that have to do with you not backing up your claims, Moonman? I'm surprised you even acknowledged sts60's argument but what kind of a response is that? People who have little to say usually talk the most blah blah blah... Please. You can stop trying to impress us with your little words of wisdom any day now. You have time to churn out steaming mounds of comments like that but no time to research your claims? BS.
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 20:40:07 GMT -4
Post by Moon Man on Apr 20, 2006 20:40:07 GMT -4
I've already researched my nuggets of wisdom. Some of you peeps are like buffalo in the old daze, charging a head with your heads down until you run off the cliff.
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 20:40:38 GMT -4
Post by Bob B. on Apr 20, 2006 20:40:38 GMT -4
You have time to churn out steaming mounds of comments like that but no time to research your claims? But of course, that is what trolls do.
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 20:41:32 GMT -4
Post by Moon Man on Apr 20, 2006 20:41:32 GMT -4
Not me though. I have lots to say You should concentrate more on quality rather than quantity. We still haven't debated the amazing vaporizing heat shield. Stay tuned for that one!
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 20:57:17 GMT -4
Post by scooter on Apr 20, 2006 20:57:17 GMT -4
I vote troll, he's stuck on stupid...
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 21:02:00 GMT -4
Post by PeterB on Apr 20, 2006 21:02:00 GMT -4
Moon Man said:
How about we finish debating the issues you haven't sorted out yet? Like how geologists can look at an Apollo rock and know it didn't come from Earth. Like how the staff at the Honeysuckle Creek Tracking Station pointed their dish at the Moon and got TV signals and other telemetry.
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 21:05:20 GMT -4
Post by Moon Man on Apr 20, 2006 21:05:20 GMT -4
I don't buy the signal crappola line. The pet moon rocks come from earth. Surf my thread on the other board, I've posted links to prove moon rocks that NASA claims came from the moon are also found on earth. In Sudbury and in South Africa.
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 21:18:29 GMT -4
Post by PeterB on Apr 20, 2006 21:18:29 GMT -4
I don't buy the signal crappola line. The pet moon rocks come from earth. Surf my thread on the other board, I've posted links to prove moon rocks that NASA claims came from the moon are also found on earth. In Sudbury and in South Africa. You don't know much geology then, do you? Geologists from around the world have looked at the Apollo rocks. One of the many things they agree about them is this: these rocks can't have come from the Earth. We've explained it before. Apollo rocks contain no water. This is unlike every rock on Earth, and it wasn't expected when the first Apollo rocks were examined. All Earth rocks contain water. This is because the water molecules form part of the chemical structure of the minerals which make up the rock. If you heat the rocks up enough to drive off the water, you won't be left with a dry rock - you'll be left with slag. Secondly, rocks which are formed from solidified lava preserve convection patterns which reflect the strength of the gravity when the lava was liquid. Solidified lava on Earth shows it was liquid in Earth-strength gravity. Solidified lava in Apollo rocks shows it was liquid in one-sixth Earth gravity. You can't fake this on Earth, even in Sudbury or South Africa. The idea that geologists from around the world could be fooled into thinking that rocks from Sudbury actually came from the Moon is laughable. If you tried something like that, they'd say, "These rocks come from Sudbury, not the Moon." The only thing sudbury has to do with Apollo is that the astronauts probably did some training there.
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 21:48:21 GMT -4
Post by PeterB on Apr 20, 2006 21:48:21 GMT -4
I don't buy the signal crappola line. That's the extent of your counter-argument? You don't buy it? Why not?
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 22:01:25 GMT -4
Post by Bob B. on Apr 20, 2006 22:01:25 GMT -4
The pet moon rocks come from earth. Surf my thread on the other board, I've posted links to prove moon rocks that NASA claims came from the moon are also found on earth. In Sudbury and in South Africa. You seem to have a problem understanding the concept of proof.
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 22:10:25 GMT -4
Post by Moon Man on Apr 20, 2006 22:10:25 GMT -4
I don't buy the signal crappola line. The pet moon rocks come from earth. Surf my thread on the other board, I've posted links to prove moon rocks that NASA claims came from the moon are also found on earth. In Sudbury and in South Africa. You don't know much geology then, do you? Geologists from around the world have looked at the Apollo rocks. One of the many things they agree about them is this: these rocks can't have come from the Earth. We've explained it before. Apollo rocks contain no water. This is unlike every rock on Earth, and it wasn't expected when the first Apollo rocks were examined. All Earth rocks contain water. This is because the water molecules form part of the chemical structure of the minerals which make up the rock. If you heat the rocks up enough to drive off the water, you won't be left with a dry rock - you'll be left with slag. Secondly, rocks which are formed from solidified lava preserve convection patterns which reflect the strength of the gravity when the lava was liquid. Solidified lava on Earth shows it was liquid in Earth-strength gravity. Solidified lava in Apollo rocks shows it was liquid in one-sixth Earth gravity. You can't fake this on Earth, even in Sudbury or South Africa. The idea that geologists from around the world could be fooled into thinking that rocks from Sudbury actually came from the Moon is laughable. If you tried something like that, they'd say, "These rocks come from Sudbury, not the Moon." The only thing sudbury has to do with Apollo is that the astronauts probably did some training there. Your reply holds no water, pun intended. The moon rocks came from an alleged crater on the moon. The rocks on the moon came from meteorites, the same type of meteors to hit the earth. They also now claim there is water on the moon, at the poles at lease, so there is water up there. There has also not be a geo-man on the moon until Apollo 17, I think, so no geo-man would know one rock from another. The Apollo 17 mission is the mission that the Sudbury rocks took part in. Sudbury's in the pet moon rock history books.
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 22:17:03 GMT -4
Post by Moon Man on Apr 20, 2006 22:17:03 GMT -4
The pet moon rocks come from earth. Surf my thread on the other board, I've posted links to prove moon rocks that NASA claims came from the moon are also found on earth. In Sudbury and in South Africa. You seem to have a problem understanding the concept of proof. At Law, there is such a thing as reverse onus, which means the onus is on the ABer to prove the evidence NASA produces is genuine. I believe it apply in this case.
|
|
|
Um...
Apr 20, 2006 22:21:42 GMT -4
Post by scooter on Apr 20, 2006 22:21:42 GMT -4
Your responses lack coherence MM. Your ignorance, and inability to read, are showing. How about YOU try re-reading the innumerable responses to your claims?
|
|