Short Clips counteracting HB claims

[Sticks]

I finally got around to editing this together, not as good as Jay's, but useable

Non Paralell Shadows

Maybe others could pick other aspects to show observations and science experiments to show how the HB claims fall down.

[scooter]

...obviously fake footage...no way on Earth could shadows behave that way!!!

Wow, very nice, and it's a movie too. No doubt the HBs will conjure up a counter-argument about it...should be fun to hear them.
I'm going up the hill later, get some varied shots of Pikes Peak to show the effect of changing foregrounds/unchanging backgrounds ( seems like such a simple concept, but...)
btw, how would one attach pics to a post? Can it be done?

[Al Johnston]

Upload them to somewhere like Flickr or Photobucket, then enclose the url in [ img] [ /img] tags.

[echnaton]

No doubt the HBs will conjure up a counter-argument about it...should be fun to hear them.

[HB] The lines are non parallel only because this is an ESSO station. ESSO is a marketing name for Exxon, an AMERICAN based OIL company that is currently ripping off the HARD GOTTEN WAGES of the WORKING man with outrageous OIL prices. They are making so much MONEY as a PAYOFF for there conspiracy with the US government to hide the MOON HOAX. ESSo can AFFORD to make the shadows do anything they want them too. [/HB]

Did I get the CAPS right?

[scooter]

dang..that was...GOOD!!! (...wiping coffee from monitor...)

[tofu]

Great Job! If I could make one suggestion: completely redo the audio. There's no reason to have those loud cars driving by.

[Sticks]

it was a location shoot to add authenticity

[gdwarf]

Well, you've already got a negative review, essentially saying that the reason the shadows aren't parallel is because the objects aren't facing the same way (Buh?).
Edit: He's also saying that they are parallel and that you've drawn all but two of the lines wrong (sigh).
I've added my own counter comment. Very good job, though. Oh, and posters here that liked it, remember to rate it well (Those stars beside it), to help counter the inevitable swarm of HBs that will try to drown it with negative reviews.

[ajv]

Here's a quick VPA for a frame from Sticks' video.



Some of the shadow points are not very clear so the lines are only approximate.

[Sticks]

I tried hard to get those lines right

My mouse may have nudged as I took my finger off of the button for those shots.

This was the original still from 2005


Did Jay ever see this attempt?

[Sticks]

I have now placed this video on YouTube here

And my new one on why there are no stars in the pictures here

[Ginnie]

I don't think it is enough to convince Bart.

Bart vs. Phil
www.youtube.com/watch?v=SabtlXmCDdM&mode=related&search=
He can openly lie about Apollo and get away with it.

[Sticks]

It is probably up there, and I may have seen it, but what was the response about this transparency claim by Bart?

[BertL]

Svector responded that if it were a transparency, it would have to have been faked really well. The cloud patterns in the Bart's "transparency clip" match up exactly to additional photgraphs made by the Apollo astronauts, and to graphs of that day's weather made by an independant meteorological institute.

EDIT: I'll clarify with "svector responded"; by this I mean Svector made a YouTube video named "Lunar Legacy" basically debunking the whole theory. And Percy's theory.

[svector]

bertls said:

I'll clarify with "svector responded"; by this I mean Svector made a YouTube video named "Lunar Legacy" basically debunking the whole theory. And Percy's theory.

Which I believe Sticks is quite familiar with. He viewed it, then proceeded to introduce me to this board.