|
Post by Sticks on Jul 30, 2006 2:50:41 GMT -4
I finally got around to editing this together, not as good as Jay's, but useable Non Paralell ShadowsMaybe others could pick other aspects to show observations and science experiments to show how the HB claims fall down.
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Jul 30, 2006 17:21:40 GMT -4
...obviously fake footage...no way on Earth could shadows behave that way!!! Wow, very nice, and it's a movie too. No doubt the HBs will conjure up a counter-argument about it...should be fun to hear them. I'm going up the hill later, get some varied shots of Pikes Peak to show the effect of changing foregrounds/unchanging backgrounds ( seems like such a simple concept, but...) btw, how would one attach pics to a post? Can it be done?
|
|
Al Johnston
"Cheer up!" they said, "It could be worse!" So I did, and it was.
Posts: 1,453
|
Post by Al Johnston on Jul 30, 2006 18:37:32 GMT -4
Upload them to somewhere like Flickr or Photobucket, then enclose the url in [ img] [ /img] tags.
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Jul 30, 2006 20:00:26 GMT -4
No doubt the HBs will conjure up a counter-argument about it...should be fun to hear them.
[HB] The lines are non parallel only because this is an ESSO station. ESSO is a marketing name for Exxon, an AMERICAN based OIL company that is currently ripping off the HARD GOTTEN WAGES of the WORKING man with outrageous OIL prices. They are making so much MONEY as a PAYOFF for there conspiracy with the US government to hide the MOON HOAX. ESSo can AFFORD to make the shadows do anything they want them too. [/HB]
Did I get the CAPS right?
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Jul 30, 2006 20:27:16 GMT -4
dang..that was...GOOD!!! (...wiping coffee from monitor...)
|
|
|
Post by tofu on Jul 30, 2006 21:19:50 GMT -4
Great Job! If I could make one suggestion: completely redo the audio. There's no reason to have those loud cars driving by.
|
|
|
Post by Sticks on Jul 31, 2006 0:08:01 GMT -4
it was a location shoot to add authenticity
|
|
|
Post by gdwarf on Aug 9, 2006 11:17:10 GMT -4
Well, you've already got a negative review, essentially saying that the reason the shadows aren't parallel is because the objects aren't facing the same way (Buh?). Edit: He's also saying that they are parallel and that you've drawn all but two of the lines wrong (sigh). I've added my own counter comment. Very good job, though. Oh, and posters here that liked it, remember to rate it well (Those stars beside it), to help counter the inevitable swarm of HBs that will try to drown it with negative reviews.
|
|
|
Post by ajv on Aug 9, 2006 19:15:28 GMT -4
Here's a quick VPA for a frame from Sticks' video. Some of the shadow points are not very clear so the lines are only approximate.
|
|
|
Post by Sticks on Aug 15, 2006 10:56:17 GMT -4
I tried hard to get those lines right My mouse may have nudged as I took my finger off of the button for those shots. This was the original still from 2005 Did Jay ever see this attempt?
|
|
|
Post by Sticks on Oct 6, 2007 14:55:04 GMT -4
I have now placed this video on YouTube hereAnd my new one on why there are no stars in the pictures here
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Oct 6, 2007 15:39:58 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Sticks on Oct 7, 2007 1:37:14 GMT -4
It is probably up there, and I may have seen it, but what was the response about this transparency claim by Bart?
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Oct 7, 2007 6:25:25 GMT -4
Svector responded that if it were a transparency, it would have to have been faked really well. The cloud patterns in the Bart's "transparency clip" match up exactly to additional photgraphs made by the Apollo astronauts, and to graphs of that day's weather made by an independant meteorological institute.
EDIT: I'll clarify with "svector responded"; by this I mean Svector made a YouTube video named "Lunar Legacy" basically debunking the whole theory. And Percy's theory.
|
|
|
Post by svector on Oct 7, 2007 6:45:07 GMT -4
I'll clarify with "svector responded"; by this I mean Svector made a YouTube video named "Lunar Legacy" basically debunking the whole theory. And Percy's theory. Which I believe Sticks is quite familiar with. He viewed it, then proceeded to introduce me to this board.
|
|