|
Post by BertL on Oct 17, 2010 14:05:12 GMT -4
So a few weeks ago some YouTuber found airbrush marks in a picture of two of Saturn's moons, taken by the Cassini orbiter. This picture was featured on the Astronomy Picture of the Day website about six months ago. The YouTuber suggested that it was evidence of NASA photoshopping images to cover up something. Some major news sources got wind of the story and decided to talk about it. The story behind the photoshopping was explained, but a lot of conspiracy theorists still weren't convinced. So, I went the extra mile and re-composited the image to see what was going on. I wrote a post about it on my blog, explaining a bit of how Cassini takes its images, how the images can be 'converted' to colour images, and why the airbrushing has been done. poopcake.tumblr.com/post/1337328670/nasas-saturn-moons-coverup-uncoveredHope you guys like it.
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Oct 17, 2010 10:10:26 GMT -4
What I'm wondering is how the petrified wood feels in comparison to rocks. I would imagine that it would feel more like wood.
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Oct 14, 2010 2:46:14 GMT -4
"Why don't you swear on the Bible that you've been stuck underground? You're a coward, and a liar..."
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Oct 14, 2010 2:13:01 GMT -4
There have already been a few guys on David Icke arguing that it was all planned out by the Illuminati, and that a lot of numerological references have showed up (33 miners got out on 10/13/10, 10 + 13 + 10 = 33 et cetera). Just goes to show that there will always be at least one "nutter".
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Oct 2, 2010 19:28:34 GMT -4
Tee hee, the newest: the "sky" in the Apollo pictures shouldn't be black. (from here)
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Sept 26, 2010 12:47:26 GMT -4
For a brief moment I was considering replying to that post with this image, but I couldn't be bothered.
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Sept 24, 2010 10:11:42 GMT -4
After a few weeks of living with very limited internet access (and as a result not being able to visit this website and the David Icke forum), I had expected rodin to bring up something of value or at least follow up to his other debunked arguments. Instead, rodin appears to have regressed into nothing but a troll. It's not too surprising, but slightly disappointing to say the least. Oh well.
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Sept 24, 2010 10:08:11 GMT -4
Bogus claim 6 What in the world is Jack White talking about? I just checked, and both images are still there. Why would anybody trust in the research of a man who can't even get simple facts like these straight? This is pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Aug 29, 2010 8:58:34 GMT -4
It looks like they are almost ready to start the "debate"! Where is this?
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Aug 23, 2010 16:16:05 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Aug 22, 2010 12:43:16 GMT -4
Happy birthday, frenat!
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Aug 22, 2010 12:42:55 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Aug 20, 2010 2:22:02 GMT -4
I really like your suggesting of being put in the ordinary members group, but I haven't seen you propose an alternative to Gary's suggestion for how to do the debate.
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Aug 19, 2010 13:17:16 GMT -4
The chamber was built before Apollo mission to Moon. I thought all you NASA buffs would know about it??? I should have provided the link though. How does the existence of a vacuum chamber prove Apollo was faked in there? Why do you assume nobody here knew about this chamber?
|
|
|
Post by BertL on Aug 18, 2010 23:16:10 GMT -4
Another classic example of Jack's silly perspective.
But wasn't it Jack who in multiple instances outright refused to discuss his own material? Pot, meet kettle.
|
|