|
Post by frenat on Feb 2, 2011 21:07:26 GMT -4
And if two different scientists give conflicting answers then the CT will pick the one that comes closest to supporting them and then call the other scientist a liar. You give them far too much credit. If the SAME scientist says two things in the SAME interview and ONE thing can be twisted to kind of mean what they want it to, they'll take that one, twist it five ways till friday, discard everything else the scientist says, never ask him to clarify anything and possibly call him a tool of the establishment/shill/CIA plant except for the one quote where he was trying to say the "truth".
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Jan 24, 2011 14:35:29 GMT -4
I always thought some of them might have been done by bored math and engineering college students.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Jan 16, 2011 21:56:35 GMT -4
I'm curious just what he thinks does make the circles since he seems set against them being human made. But since he rarely takes a definite stand on anything without plenty of backslide room we'll probably never know.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Jan 16, 2011 11:31:51 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Dec 19, 2010 16:51:36 GMT -4
I think it is more of a inability to ever admit he is wrong accompanied with a stubborn refusal to ever look at or acknowledge any evidence that goes against his views (which of course feeds the first part).
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Dec 18, 2010 20:28:59 GMT -4
He'll probably bring it up again in 6 months like nothing ever happened. ;D
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Dec 18, 2010 11:09:00 GMT -4
Apparently Jack doesn't even know what a camera looks like. Okay, to his credit, it is the UV camera. And even more to his credit, he asked "what is this piece of equipment?" instead of stringing out another complex theory on guesswork and ignorance. But I recognized it, and I'm not even that familiar with the scientific gear. I figured that he knew exactly what it was and was trying to use it as a trap somehow (perhaps by claiming it was really something else or that it couldn't work as advertised) but it never panned out or at least hasn't yet.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Nov 28, 2010 22:58:28 GMT -4
There was a guy on the David Icke forum that claimed that only low Earth orbit was possible. His replacement for geostationary satellites was a vast constellation of networked leo satellites that switched on and off when they came into view. When it was pointed out that many thousands of satellites would be needed and that it would mean that you could essentially point the receiving dish anywhere and pick up a signal he wasn't phased and just said "somebody would figure it out". His reasoning for why anything above leo was impossible had something to do with the vacuum tube. Supposedly in his mind a vacuum tube proved that EM radiation couldn't travel through the Van Allen belts. I think he was also the guy that believed that nuclear power and weapons don't exist and Hiroshima and Nagasaki were faked with multiple tons of secretly planted TNT.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Nov 9, 2010 20:46:19 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Nov 9, 2010 19:22:38 GMT -4
He actually thinks it looks "exactly" like the official footage. Nevermind that the suit and lander both show differences. Nevermind that the original site it appeared on ADMITTED to faking it. It's black and white and blurry. That's close enough right?
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Nov 7, 2010 23:40:49 GMT -4
Nah. I think he should continue to ignore Jarrah. It is far more fun to watch Jarrah get obsessive over Jay's lack of attention to him. Jarrah's being saying nice things about Jay lately. I almost choked on my porridge when I heard it. Apparently Jay runs the top debunking site on the web, and therefore Jarrah would expect that if anyone had reviewed his work it would have been Jay. Jarrah seems quite miffed that when he did a search of Clavius, he only found his name once. I guess he's beginnig to realise that Mr Windely is giving him a stiff ignoring. That is beginnig to irk Master White, me thinks. Good for him. I haven't really seen much from Jarrah worth paying attention to. Most of his crap is rehashed junk from other HBs with just enough new angles to show he's good at googling but he doesn't really understand much of any of what he talks about.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Nov 7, 2010 21:58:37 GMT -4
Folks, For a variety of reasons I'm going to take another break from Apollo related activities for a few months to concentrate on some personal and professional matters. I may pop in from time to time, but please carry on in my absence. I guess I speak for all, but your learned contributions will be missed. I wish you well. I hope you come back with 40 pages of Clavius devoted to Jarrah's videos ;D Nah. I think he should continue to ignore Jarrah. It is far more fun to watch Jarrah get obsessive over Jay's lack of attention to him.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Oct 18, 2010 17:02:41 GMT -4
Not to put a downer on things but why are we doing the research for the HB camp? Because the only thing we know for sure is they won't.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Oct 18, 2010 16:59:43 GMT -4
- The museum did call NASA to try and get some verification of the rock and were told that while it was possible, only samples from later Apollo missions were given out in the early 1970's. Apparently the museum did no other followup. The Rijksmuseum is an art museum. They probably don't authenticate very many things outside of art. The info-person they talked to at NASA probably didn't even know the astronauts went on a Goodwill tour before the phone call. It's probably the same info-person who constantly refers me to the NTRS, even after I've told them I've already checked there. For all we know it could have been a secretary or a janitor.
|
|
|
Post by frenat on Oct 18, 2010 16:52:59 GMT -4
Awesome! I bet that got his knickers in a twist.
|
|