|
Post by unknown on Jun 3, 2005 13:45:56 GMT -4
I'm sorry, JeyUtah but you don't understand anythng about mechanics of forces, about faked images and faked movies, and now in plain evidence you don't understand anything about sense of humour. You are only verbose, pedantic and boring. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 3, 2005 7:23:05 GMT -4
Hey, Bob B.
look at all the other shadows in the picture. LIGHT COMES FROM THE RIGHT AND ALL THE GROUND AROUND PROJECTS SHADOWS ON THE LEFT. IT IS AN ALTO-RILIEVO. Things happened this way at Nasa: the art director in faked film told an idiot photographer: "put this image into relief, it's very important, it's the first foot on the moon". The poor photographer misunderstood and made the foot-print in alto-rilievo. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 2, 2005 17:50:51 GMT -4
Hey, Bob B. you have trouble with your eyes. THAT FOOT-PRINT IS IN ALTO-RILIEVO. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 2, 2005 17:23:15 GMT -4
See again this image www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/home/F_Apollo_11.html"Image to left: The first footprints on the Moon will be there for a million years. There is no wind to blow them away. Credit: NASA" Does it seem to you a foot-print? Look at shadows carefully. What do you see? That foot-print shows an elevation that projects a big shadow on the left. Hey, martin, tracks sink on the ground, tracks are like a bas-relief. In that image instead the foot-print forms a high-relief. You know it's impossible that a foot-print is in elevation. This image is the most faked one you can see. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 2, 2005 10:02:44 GMT -4
Is this image real? www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/home/F_Apollo_11.html Go to the first footprint on the moon, the image where they say: "Image to left: The first footprints on the Moon will be there for a million years. There is no wind to blow them away. Credit: NASA"
Don't you see anything strange, don't you see anything wrong in that image?
Try to guess. I will tell you tonight in "A question of credibility" thread. See you again soon
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 1, 2005 17:27:14 GMT -4
Faked scenarios were made in some desert place ;D ;D ;D
Let me see the movie of astronauts jumping on the moon. Where can I see it? It's much time I haven't seen that film.
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 1, 2005 13:52:09 GMT -4
IT'S NOT A SONG, IT'S THE TRUTH. ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 6, 2005 8:54:09 GMT -4
JayUtah wrote: "... He (unknown) has said on numerous occasions that I don't know the behavior of natural forces. That implies he does. If those two propositions were true, he could describe how and why my explanations fail. That is, instead of just saying "Jay is wrong," he could say, "Jay is wrong because..."
Because, if you were less arrogant, would know you make a big simplification to solve the problems of balance in the space: there are infinite moments of the forces in the space and you, instead, reduce them on a plane. So lunar modul doesn't work as you think. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 6, 2005 8:40:29 GMT -4
martin wrote: "Maybe you are too busy saying a lot of craps, so you forget my challenge. You will show to us stability of a helicopter without ability to change the angle of each rotor as it spins. Remember you can win a special award from this:
www.darwinawards"You talked about low pressure and high pressure of the rotor. You talk about low pressure and high pressure also when you speak about wings of planes.
You have not understood anything about helicopters and planes. How can a plane fly with a symmetrical shape of wings? Because low pressure and high pressure of wings have no importance and it flys in spite of your wrong theories.
Helicopters don't fly because they create a low and a high pressure. They fly screwing in the air. To be able to change the angle of their rotor make them able to fly slowly or fastly using better the power of the engine. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 17:12:43 GMT -4
What is the right user name of JeyUtah?
See you again soon
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 16:54:26 GMT -4
My challenge is this: Tell Nasa to build this old crock Tell Nasa to put on its bottom a powerful rocket engine so that it can fly on the earth. Tell Nasa to invite all the TV of the world to see how the pilot JeyUtah will be able to keep it in hovering at a few feet close to the ground. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 16:18:19 GMT -4
JeyUtah wrote:
"Here are three problems for you to solve to prove to us you really know about flight dynamics. If you decline to solve them, this conversation (and likely your sojourn here) is over.
1. Consider a spheroid spacecraft with a diameter of 3 meters hovering 100 meters above the lunar surface. The spacecraft has a gross mass of 1,000 kg. Assume for this problem that it has the mass properties of a solid sphere of the given mass. At the bottom of this spacecraft is an engine with a thrust of 100,000 N. The throat of the rocket is on the perimeter of the spacecraft sphere. The thrust -- for whatever reason -- goes 2.5 degrees off-axis. What is the rotation rate of the spacecraft in the off-axis plane after 1 second?
2. Solve the problem above with a thrust of 10,000 N.
3. Solve the problem above with a thrust of 10,000 N, but this time an altitude of only 50 meters.
These are extremely elementary problems in flight dynamics. If you can't solve these, then there is no reason to believe you have any basis from which to criticize anyone else. My staff engineers can solve these problems in about 5 minutes. As a control, I gave this problem to a 16-year-old high school physics student, who solved it in about 10 minutes. (He had to find some formulas.)
You have 24 hours. Put up or shut up".
Luckily I am not a student, so get your sister to make those problems. Is nice your sister? ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 15:52:20 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 14:13:15 GMT -4
JeyUtah in Reply #112 wrote: "No, unknown, it is highly rude to make others try to guess at what you're thinking. If you have a question or a conclusion -- state it!"
Martin in Reply #110 wrote: "No, I did not play your game. You were humourous for a short time, but this is ended".
I conduct the game, not you. ;D ;D ;D
I repeat: I have seen again carefully the image of the first foot-print on the moon. I'm really right: light is on the right, in fact all the ground around projects shadows on the left. THE FOOT-PRINT IS IN ALTO-RILIEVO. What a poor figure for Nasa. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 5, 2005 5:00:35 GMT -4
I wrote: "When you apply mathematics to physics you can't consider all the various angles (because you don't know which they are)..."JayUtah wrote: "Of course I know what all "the angles" are; it's my job".YOU ARE ONLY REALLY ARROGANT: also doctors do their job, but they have not yet found how to treat and to cure many kinds of cancer.
|
|