|
Post by unknown on Jun 4, 2005 17:16:27 GMT -4
I have seen again carefully the image of the first foot-print on the moon. I'm really right: light is on the right, in fact all the ground around projects shadows on the left. THE FOOT-PRINT IS IN ALTO-RILIEVO. What a poor figure for Nasa. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 4, 2005 10:23:49 GMT -4
JayUtah wrote: "Refute this with mathematical rigor, if you can".
Hey, JayUtah Mathematics is a rigorous discipline if you do operations using its relationships in its ambit. When you apply mathematics to physics you can't consider all the various angles (because you don't know which they are) and you simplify the big complexity of problems and think vangloriously to have understood the enormous complexity of the universe. Be quiet, little man, you know almost nothing about forces that reign in the universe. In fact you are so small that you don't understand what even a child can realize. Nobody in 1969 (and perhaps even today) could pilot that nice old crock (Lunar Module) thrusted from the bottom driving it being seated inside. If you don't understand this simple thing, you are a big idiot and your mathematics has distroyed your little brain. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 3, 2005 16:42:56 GMT -4
sts60 wrote: "1. "Bending moment" isn't what you're thinking about. Try Googling up another random term and see if we're any more impressed next time".
In the space moments of the forces (o.k.?) are infinite and an object hanging on the bottom will roll down in any directions.
I want to make an example for children: if you, dear little child, put your forefinger under a can of coke you'll see that it will fall down in any directions and you will not able to keep it "in hovering". If your forefinger was a magnet and the can was made by iron, you easily could lift the can sustaining it from the top. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 3, 2005 15:35:33 GMT -4
LunarOrbit wrote: "Children also believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. That doesn't mean they're real.
And you believe that ridiculous Lunar Module, that old crock (assembled with tape) with only one rocket engine on the bottom can fly in hovering going backwards. Haven't you still understood that if you push an object from the bottom it will roll down in any directions. You must study mechanics of forces. I suggest you to begin with bending moment. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 3, 2005 13:51:23 GMT -4
DaveC wrote: "OK - so in answer to my speculation in another thread, I guess we're dealing with a child".
Thank you, only children see the truth. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 2, 2005 18:03:02 GMT -4
Dear friend, also you don't know what to answer. That picture is faked. Also a child can see in it a foot-print in alto-rilievo. See you again soon
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 2, 2005 17:46:30 GMT -4
You don't know what to answer and you are finding only a pretext. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 2, 2005 16:44:46 GMT -4
Dear martin, I'm sorry but you haven't guessed. See again this image www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/home/F_Apollo_11.html"Image to left: The first footprints on the Moon will be there for a million years. There is no wind to blow them away. Credit: NASA" Does it seem to you a foot-print? Look at shadows carefully. What do you see? That foot-print shows an elevation that projects a big shadow on the left. Hey, martin, tracks sink on the ground, tracks are like a bas-relief. In that image instead the foot-print forms a high-relief.You know it's impossible that a foot-print is in elevation.This image is the most faked one you can see. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 2, 2005 16:15:19 GMT -4
Hey, papageno remember that Leonardo da Vinci is the father of plane and helicopter. I'm sorry, but you don't understand when I speak metaphorically. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 2, 2005 10:24:08 GMT -4
martin wrote: "No, I do not think you are idiot, you are only person in this forum who has called others idiot. I think you are intelligent person with intelligent opinons. Opinion that helicopter is stable because rotor is on top is very intelligent. Other people who are less intelligent think complicated mechanism is needed to change angle of blade as it is rotating. You can show to them your intelligence by flying helicopter without this mechanism. There is special award called Darwin award for people who can demonstrate intelligence in this way.
Martin"
It's not so complicated: helicopter "screws itself" in the air like a screw screws itself in the wood or metal. That complicated mechanism is not really complicated: it's as if helicopter changed the pitch of its threading to "penetrate" more or less quickly in the air. See you again soon
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 2, 2005 1:59:39 GMT -4
"So many have returned to this forum. Now we need only a nazi, and every thing is as before the interruption of the web site... Martin" Thanks to my intelligent opinions.Do you think only you are intelligent? Do you think all people that think Americans never went to the moon are idiot? Well, then try to confute this obviousness: www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/home/F_Apollo_11.htmlGo to the first footprint on the moon, the image where they say: "Image to left: The first footprints on the Moon will be there for a million years. There is no wind to blow them away. Credit: NASA" Don't you see anything strange, don't you see anything wrong in that image? ;D ;D ;D
Try to guess. I will tell you tonight.See you again soon
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 1, 2005 17:56:06 GMT -4
JeyUtah wrote: As to faked film, I suggest you stick with the current topic, which is space flight dynamics. I do not condone the conspiracy theorist tactic of abruptly changing the subject when cornered.
Hey, the current topic is: "A question of credibility", not "Space flight dynamics". You don't understand, sorry but it's the truth. ;D ;D ;D See you again soon
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 1, 2005 17:49:58 GMT -4
You wrote: "I am not sure, but I think "than I" is correct way in the sentence of unknown, because it takes place of "many persons," and correct way is "I say," not "Me say." But in the sentence of JayUtah, it takes place of "anyone," and correct way is "found me" and not "found I." So I think in the sentence of JayUtah, "than me" is correct. But I do not have a very strong English.
It is not an important issue, any way.
Martin"
YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY AND THEN YOU BEGIN TO SAY A LOT OF CRAPS TO MINIMIZE MY OPINIONS. FILM YOUR FLAG WITH A SONY CAMCORDER PLEASE. DEMONSTRATE YOU WENT TO THE MOON. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 1, 2005 17:31:39 GMT -4
Hey, do you think that film on Mars is real? ;D Then you don't understand anything about mechanics of forces and anything about faked film.
|
|
|
Post by unknown on Jun 1, 2005 17:06:41 GMT -4
You wrote: See... that's the problem. You've already given yourself an excuse to ignore any satellite images of the landing sites, so why should we bother? If you are just going to claim the images are fake then there is no point in investing the millions of dollars required to take those pictures. Sorry but you have not understood: I haven't said to take pictures. You must film with a Sony camcorder (not the ugly ones made in Congo used by Spirit because they jerk along) the moment when you are more and more closer to the moon and slowly you must film your flag and the moon all around (not tons of stones like Spirit on Mars). This way they will be able to understand if you have done a real film or another 3D cartoon like those made by Spirit on Mars. ;DLike this: marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/video/spirit01.html > Multimedia >Spirit on Mars >MPEG
|
|