|
Post by unknown on May 30, 2005 15:31:18 GMT -4
I had problems with my computer, I could not read what you have replied. Excuse me for my last post, the same of the previous one. But see this movie: origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20050308a/MER_Spirit_navcam365-390_anim-A419R1_br.gifYou have done 500 million kilometers to go to Mars, you spent 7 months to arrive there, you spent a lot of money to build 2 probes, Spirit (the human-eyed ostrich similar to a famous science fiction character), and you decide to film tons of stones? Why doesn't Spirit raise its head to look at horizon all around?
|
|
|
Post by unknown on May 30, 2005 15:12:30 GMT -4
Hey, don't be angry. "Put a rocket engine under that ugly old crock (lunar module) and try to keep it in hovering seated inside". "That was done several times. Qualified engineers from all countries don't seem to have a problem believing it was done, so what makes you special?" Please go to Google.com and write "We never went to the moon". You can find 4,150,000 websites in which they say Americans never went to the moon and they list many errors in the imagines of lunar landing, images that could not be faked with Photoshop or Softimage. For this reason Nasa built that big crane hanging lunar module, covering the structures with black tissues and taking photoghraphs in the darkness, using spot lights in an almost intelligent way. Unfortunately they have done too many errrors in those images. But I prefer to talk about the most evident fact: nobody in 1969 (and perhaps even today) could keep in hovering that heavy piece of metal (or plastic?) and land it without crashing, driving it seated inside without seeing vertical attitude, thrusted from the bottom by a rocket engine. Nobody would have been able to land going backwards with that orrible rickety vehicle, ridiculous, the contrary of aerodynamics and not able to contain 3 astronauts and "safety" moon car. I'm sorry but things stay this way Big spot light or the sun? On the moon there is no air. They could see many more stars than on the earth. And, instead NO STAR, INCREDIBLE. AND, SORRY, BUT THE BACKGROUND IS TOO SMALL TO BE REAL
|
|
|
Post by unknown on May 30, 2005 13:47:51 GMT -4
Hey, don't be angry. "Put a rocket engine under that ugly old crock (lunar module) and try to keep it in hovering seated inside".
"That was done several times. Qualified engineers from all countries don't seem to have a problem believing it was done, so what makes you special?"
PLease go to Google.com and write: "we never went to the moon" You can visit 4,150,000 websites that say you never went to the moon because of many reasons. Instead of listing a lot of errors in the images of fake lunar landing, I prefer to talk about the most evident fact: nobody in 1969 could pilot that heavy piece of metal (or plastic?) thrusted from the bottom by a rocket engine. As in 1969 there were not softwares to fake images like Photoshop, Softimage and so on, Nasa filmed lunar module hanging to that big crane in the darkness, covering the structures with black tissues and using spot lights to show lunar module flying in the darkness of universe.
|
|
|
Post by unknown on May 30, 2005 10:56:56 GMT -4
Hey, what is that ridiculous rockety vehicle, that ugly old crock, dinosaur skeleton shaped? When it is starting a lot of smoke, fire, flames, when it flyes only a few farts. In your opinion: you must land lunar module on the moon and therefore you train with that orrible vehicle so unlike the one you will have to fly and to keep in hovering. Do you feel well? Really? "Helicopters were invented before the Apollo lunar module (and before computers) and yet they hovered just fine". Helicopters on the moon can't fly because there is no air. "The harrier jumpjet was also invented before the Apollo lunar module". Show me a movie of a harrier jumpjet before 1969, please. "Explain why it was not possible". Invite three friends of yours at home. You and your friends must balance a chair holding it lifted from the ground with your forefingers under its legs. A little of practice and you will be able. But try to do this: once each put your forefinger under a glass coke bottle and try to balance it. Difficult? Impossible? Put a rocket engine under that ugly old crock (lunar module) and try to keep it in hovering seated inside. Perhaps not even today we could do that.
|
|
|
Post by unknown on May 29, 2005 16:37:25 GMT -4
Please go to: grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001281.jpgIn 1969, without computers, nobody would have been able to keep in hovering that heavy piece of metal and to land it without crashing. Also today no aerobatic pilot can keep in hovering (vertical position) his plane because he can't see vertical position and can't react in time to keep it. Nasa built that big crane to film Lunar Module as it was on the moon. Also all images and movies on Mars are faked: they have been made by 3D models or by 3D softwares as Softimage, Maya, 3D Studio Max and so on.
|
|