|
Post by Czero 101 on Nov 10, 2007 13:21:53 GMT -4
Here's the corrected linkAs to what the picture is...? Can't make any conclusive determination without seeing a picture of the area behind them. It could be something that was there, but because of the way in which it is seen in the picture, it looks like the "demon dog". It could be a lighting anomaly (e.g. odd flash reflection). Since it is impossible with the evidence given to completely eliminate the possibility, it could very well be a "demon dog". There's an enormously high probability that it isn't, but without further evidence, IMO, there's no way to 100% sure. Cz
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Nov 7, 2007 22:40:01 GMT -4
Ah.... ok... thanks...
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Nov 7, 2007 21:53:04 GMT -4
What exactly is the "Lunar X"...?
Cz
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Nov 4, 2007 17:12:25 GMT -4
Nahh... its just a glitch in the Matrix... ;D Cz
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Nov 4, 2007 15:51:14 GMT -4
Because genes do not entirely determine appearance - environment (especially nutrition) plays a big role. Yet another "Nature vs. Nurture" argument, of asort, no? Cz
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Mar 22, 2008 16:34:58 GMT -4
I LOVE that commercial!... ;D
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Mar 22, 2008 5:52:58 GMT -4
Happy Birthday William "James T. Kirk T. J. Hooker Walter H. Bascom Denny Crane" Shatner!
Cz
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Nov 7, 2007 1:55:26 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Nov 7, 2007 1:40:09 GMT -4
Anyone remember these?
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Nov 7, 2007 1:38:57 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Nov 2, 2007 13:18:38 GMT -4
Cz
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Oct 3, 2007 16:22:37 GMT -4
I thought rumormill and who were partners? Here he says differently Maybe they are both relatives and partners....? That would certainly explain a lot too... Cz
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Oct 3, 2007 14:10:27 GMT -4
Cz
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Oct 2, 2007 19:17:42 GMT -4
It comes down manners not obligation. Yes, and you showed a complete lack of any manners by letting someone else deal with your problem, instead of taking the matter into your own hands like an adult and solving it without all the handwaving and chewing of the scenery. Cz
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Oct 2, 2007 18:12:03 GMT -4
About as twisted as it is that after 13+ pages of your drivel you STILL can't see that you are just not wanting to take responsibility for your actions. YOU asked the ambiguous question in the first place. YOU let your partner step up to the plate for you instead of dealing with things on your own. YOU started this thread in public rather then just deal with the other person on your own. YOU are showing the rest of the board how pathetic your life must be inasmuch as you seem to think that you bear NO RESPONSIBILITY in this whole incident. YOU are the one who is perpetuating this entire situation, propelling it to astronomical heights of inanity and drama. YOU were the one with the problem. YOU were the one who failed to do anything about it. Like i said if someone points out your upsetting someone you dont make demands that she say s so herself before you will stop you just stop. If I upset someone, I EXPECT that person to come to me. Its NO ONE ELSE'S business at that point. Come to me privately, deal with the situation, and if I am wrong, I will admit it and we can all move on. That's the mature way to deal with things. I don't want to hear from some 3rd party, regardless of who it is in relation to the other person. Either step up yourself, or MOVE ON and learn from your mistakes. Cz
|
|