|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jul 11, 2005 22:37:58 GMT -4
As a long time competitive shooter, I don't see anything to make me believe that LHO did not act alone. I can't speak to the photo or other evidence but the shooting itself is pretty straight forward.
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jun 17, 2005 22:40:18 GMT -4
I haven't saw any photos of an "unscathed" lawn (except jack whites ) Where are they posted?
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jun 6, 2005 17:46:36 GMT -4
What an idiot, unknown has just made an hateful post on LunarOrbit's other forum. And he has not hidden his email in that forum, so he is no more "unknown" ;D ;D ;D Martin Thanks, I have been looking for mr arriba's e-mail addy for a while now
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jun 4, 2005 22:50:45 GMT -4
Jay, I'm just amazed at the things that he comes up with. Must stay up nights trying to be silly.
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jun 4, 2005 20:49:55 GMT -4
unknown wrote
Do you believe that a ridiculous Boeing can distroy, can raze to the ground that way a powerful skyscraper 200,000 tons heavy?
Since that is exactly what happened, yes I do.
unknown wrote Since the plane went against the high part of the tower, a big or small part of it had to stand.
What?
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jun 18, 2005 15:11:52 GMT -4
"sources"? Are you referring to tarot cards or a cyrstal ball?
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Apr 20, 2006 12:22:45 GMT -4
And to learn some basic astronomy. "the moon dose not revolve" Sheesh! Good catch. I was too busy laughing to notice that. ;D
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Mar 29, 2006 22:02:42 GMT -4
but simply to pass through them and make round trip to the moon orbit, circle the moon few ties and come back . When they circle the moon they should be able to take nice photo of one of the moon bases and or vehicles. Ahhh,you choose not to believe in the most documented achievement in human history but would accept a photo taken today? Said photo would have to be taken by the same agency that you believe faked all earlier landings but now you will believe. does that make sense to anybody else?
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Feb 7, 2006 18:41:20 GMT -4
Welcome azdazer! I work for a large aerospace company and am constantly amazed at the number of people that work here and are willing to believe that Apollo was a hoax. a surprising number of whom should have the technical background to see through the HBs silly stories.
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jan 30, 2006 21:23:51 GMT -4
The world that jack lives in is a strange one
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jan 24, 2006 23:43:37 GMT -4
What you say about xian fundamentalists is true, but to my mind HBs beliefs do not, quite, rise to religion. Unless HBs have a deity that I have not heard about?
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jan 20, 2006 18:58:12 GMT -4
The upper forums appear to be reaasonably well run but the conspiracy believers
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Apr 14, 2006 23:23:26 GMT -4
No I'm getting really depressed. The GLP crowd on the French mockumentary The dark Side of the Moon. GLP-linkTo wade through that forum,, Sir, I salute your tolerance
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jan 29, 2006 0:45:08 GMT -4
I think I figured it out. He confused a physics and phys ed. ;D
|
|
|
Post by snakeriverrufus on Jan 12, 2006 16:29:16 GMT -4
It's not a contradiction but I've always been amused by the people who think that they are clever enough to "prove" that the moon landings were faked after all the evidence has been looked at by educated, technical, trained, experts in their fields
|
|