|
Post by thetart on Oct 2, 2009 11:57:50 GMT -4
On the other hand HBs are great fodder for trolling.
I liked the guy who said Apollo never happened but while they were on the moon they saw alien spaceships. I still think he hasn't quite understood the paradox yet.
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Sept 30, 2009 4:56:21 GMT -4
You never know - if he is a real man he will come out of the closet and admit he was fooling everyone. If he doesn't though he deserves to be humiliated.
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Sept 30, 2009 4:47:53 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Sept 4, 2009 4:19:43 GMT -4
Best photo yet. If they are going to get even better then this is going to be a good discussion topic with the HBs.
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Aug 28, 2009 3:05:24 GMT -4
No, thats where Apollo 11 really landed, but the astronauts froze to death during those several hours when they supposedly were "resting" after landing on the moon. The Apollo 11 CM secretly rendezvoused with Apollo 10's LM (secretly left in lunar orbit) and then secretly landed and retrieved the bodies which were secretly reanimated using a formula from secret WWII nazi medical experiments. Thats why the Apollo 11 astronauts were in "quarantine" for so long. It took a while for them to sufficiently recover in order to appear normal. And since Apollo 11 really landed where Apollo 12 was supposed to land, since Apollo 10's LM descent stage also secretly landed next to the Apollo 11 LM to retrieve the frozen astronauts, and since Apollo 12 really secretly landed where Apollo 11 was supposed to land in the first place, this is why the Apollo 12 landing site has not and never will be photographed. Why? Because the LRO would show two LMs at the Apollo 12 landing site which really is where Apollo 11 landed. And of course the LRO photo of the Apollo 11 descent stage really is a photo of the Apollo 12 descent stage. But that photograph was okay to publish since it is impossible to tell the descent stages apart since they all look identical. Now, before ya'all jump on me, I absolutely know that this stuff is absolutely true since I read it on one of the HB web sites and they have "proof" that this is what really happened. Not only that, my own independent research shows that one of Nostradamus's quatrains secretly describes these very events. Why in the world would they lie about such a thing? After all, they would look like fools if proven wrong. ;D lol You should get an account on Icke. Remember to tell them that prior to landing back on earth they made some crop circles using their secret maser technology.
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Aug 20, 2009 8:46:18 GMT -4
Is this in the right forum? Maybe not. Feel free to move. I think it should be here though- it is evidence that works against the HB viewpoint.
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Aug 20, 2009 8:02:37 GMT -4
Thanks but is there any reason for this? I guess it may be something to do with the LRO orbit path or something but I can't wait to see it. Hopefully the Surveyor vehicle will be imaged also.
btw - Was 12 planned to land so close to it? If so it must have been a textbook landing.
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Aug 20, 2009 7:59:33 GMT -4
I didn't like it. It was mostly James May getting a flight in a U2 interspersed with a few words from some of the astronauts.
I did like it when he took Charlie Duke outside his house to have a look at the old sports car though.
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Aug 20, 2009 7:32:29 GMT -4
New LRO photo of Apollo 14 site here.. lroc.sese.asu.edu/I can't find any LRO photos of the Apollo 12 site with the Surveyor craft. Anybody got a link?
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Aug 4, 2009 5:47:36 GMT -4
It's a shame that not one HB can come up with one item on their list! To be fair, we don't really have any around at the moment. Not much point in doing this exercise on this forum. Join a HB forum like Icke and try it there. Be prepared for lots of nonsense arguments though. The best one I saw was - Apollo didn't happen but Aldrin saw UFOs when he was on the moon!
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Jul 29, 2009 9:58:04 GMT -4
At the correct moment, explosive bolts joining the two stages together were fired to separate them. Also, a guillotine severed the cables joining the halves. These were under the control of Program 12, which also fired the ascent engine. Tx. Was there any redundancy? i.e. backup systems? I just think that if any of the severing was to fail then the whole ascent would fail. Are there any drawings or diagrams of the system?
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Jul 29, 2009 9:28:02 GMT -4
Can anyone give some details of how the ascent stage of the LEM sperates from the descent stage on takeoff? I think it was bolts that were severed by explosives but if anyone can provide details that would be welcome.
|
|
|
Post by thetart on Dec 10, 2008 10:33:19 GMT -4
The photos are not sufficient confirmation. However, I think more compelling is the recreation of the Apollo 15 surface landscape here. Scroll down to Fig 5 www.jaxa.jp/press/2008/05/20080520_kaguya_e.htmlMy interpretation is that either the Japanese have faked their photo (why should they?) or the Apollo photo must be real. I can't believe that if the Apollo photo was taken in a studio in 1971 then they would have got the landscape so accurate. I assume that the Japanese will be making more and more of these perspective views once the terrain camera builds up its surface map to include other sites. Am I the only one who thinks this evidence is compelling?
|
|