|
Post by graham2001 on Sept 5, 2007 11:54:12 GMT -4
I have been suspecting that it was a viral marketing ploy for a while now. I always thought this was going to turn out to be one of those postmodern 'art' things like the 'Soyuz 2' nonsense put on display in Spain back in the 90's. It's interesting to see however that the company is linking to another person releasing videos to support the set linked to in the OP.
|
|
|
Post by macapple on Sept 25, 2007 20:57:33 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by graham2001 on Oct 10, 2007 11:46:38 GMT -4
I'm glad to see someone has tracked down part of this hoaxers audio stockpile.
Interestingly we are almost half-way through October, the month in which there was supposed to be a 'big revelation'.
I wonder if the hoaxer has lost interest in his little game?
|
|
|
Post by graham2001 on Apr 6, 2008 13:46:48 GMT -4
This is a bump of an old but somewhat interesting thread. The original hoaxer 'Retiredafb' seems to have disappeared and taken his footage with him. (Thankfully I saved them all before they did so ) However others are carrying on the 'work' of perpetuating and extending the hoax. Behold: ValValiantThor& rrmmii& Moonwalker1966Delta who I suspect is the original hoaxer under another guise. But thankfully that's not all, someone did a video using Orbiter showing what would happen if a Saturn V was[/i] launched from Vandenberg. www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-OxRvyx17kI plan to pull down VVTs & Moonwalker1966Delta's videos tomorrow, I'll let you know what I think after I've watched them.
|
|
|
Post by Count Zero on Apr 6, 2008 18:28:44 GMT -4
The Youtube video was nice. Not enough smoke at launch, but he included the ice falling off the booster.
|
|
|
Post by graham2001 on Apr 6, 2008 21:04:06 GMT -4
The Youtube video was nice. Not enough smoke at launch, but he included the ice falling off the booster. That's just a limitation of the SIM program ( Orbiter) he was using, I've got it myself, as far as I can tell the physics are accurate. I've been back and checked that users (armin3773) posts and he did some other vids on the Apollo 20 hoax, rather than link to them individually I'm just going to link to his YouTube page: Armin3773. Two highlights are: 1. Home made CSM Vid.2. Annotated CSM Ingress VideoWhile checking the comments on one of ValValiantThors clips I found this debunking site.Also I've found Retiredafbs youtube page. He claims to have moved his material to a new site (revver <DOT> com). I'm not going there from my own computer, god knows what I could catch from doing that.
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Apr 7, 2008 9:59:45 GMT -4
Re revver etc. Just had a look see, on a mac so no worries for me there. BUT from the FAQ about revver from their own web site. www.revver.com/go/faq/#general1 hope that has not ruffled any feathers posting that. Easy to get a high blood pressure looking at some of that stuff about 20 though. Wow, city on the moon. Well I never. Whatever next.
|
|
|
Post by graham2001 on Apr 8, 2008 11:16:51 GMT -4
Easy to get a high blood pressure looking at some of that stuff about 20 though. Wow, city on the moon. Well I never. Whatever next. What raises my blood pressure is that: a): Anyone actually believed that nonsense. b): Some people for whatever reason decided to support/expand it it. I mean look at these this Youtube vid from October last year: ALIEN SPACESHIP ON THE MOON flyover bef. FOLLOW THE DARKAnd then there is the Spaceheroes.com site, which includes such gems as: I don't know what 'product' is being pushed by this, but as soon as I find out what it is, I'll no longer buy it.
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Apr 8, 2008 12:40:17 GMT -4
Very curious as to motives but I suspect someone will grow up. Maybe.
Looking at the number of people who believe the whole Apollo was a hoax it is easy to see other hoax idea's getting a following. I think its down to outright distrust to anything/person in authority and latching on to this stuff with blinkers.
I did originally think it was from a young age that the idea's are formed, you know, follow the leader in school not wanting to be seen to be a free thinker. Or maybe wanting to be different? But the net has knocked that one on the head, getting hooked when young that is. Recently looking at the usual suspects stuff on YouTube has thrown me another googly (cricket term not search engine). Now I just think its an idea and "damn anyone who can prove me wrong, try it, go on, what? You have evidence? I don't trust that cos I don't like it, the colour is wrong, change subject, back out....etc etc"
20 stinks from the start.
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Apr 8, 2008 18:05:39 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Apr 8, 2008 18:36:44 GMT -4
Well I can start here.
The Astronauts were all Air force or Navy, not Army, thus most would not have been West Point students. Further some were civilians and at least one never attended any military training.
Starting with 11:
Armstrong – Purdue University, University of Southern California Aldrin – U.S. Military Academy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Collins – U.S. Military Academy Conrad - Princeton University Gordon – University of Washington Bean - University of Texas Lovell - U.S. Naval Academy Swigert - University of Colorado, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, University of Hartford Haise - University of Oklahoma Sheppard –U.S. Naval Academy Roosa – University of Colorado Mitchell - Carnegie Institute of Technology, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Scott – U.S. Military Academy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Worden – U.S. Military Academy, University of Michigan Irwin - U.S. Naval Academy, University of Michigan Young – Georgia, U. S. Navy Test Pilot School Mattingly – Auburn University Duke - U.S. Naval Academy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Air Force Aerospace Research Pilot School Cernan – Purdue, US. Naval Postgraduate School Evans - University of Kansas, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School Schmitt – Caltech, University of Oslo, Harvard University
So from the list only 4 of the 21 when to West Point, the same as the number that when to the Naval Academy and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology!
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Apr 8, 2008 18:45:50 GMT -4
I'm a little sceptical here since I can see no reason that the USAF would be interested in the Soviet N-1 (I might be wrong but I suspect a Cold War Warrior would speak of Soviet rather then Russian too) and the USAF didn't get their hands on a Foxbat until a month AFTER the so-called Apollo 20 was supposed to have been flown. Having said that, there is no proof either way on either of these as it's likely that there was a unit of the USAF trying to determine the Mig-25's characteristics in the late 60's and early 70's.
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Post by Bob B. on Apr 8, 2008 20:16:03 GMT -4
The constitutional crisis and conflict in Moscow to which he refers occurred in October 1993.
Conrad’s middle name in not Peter; his given name is simply Charles Conrad, Junior. However, since his mother wanted to name him Peter, this is the name by which he was called. He later became known as just 'Pete'.
It was LM, not LEM. An astronaut would know this and would not keep making this mistake.
Luna 15 was a lander and soil sample return mission that failed. It was not a probe like Ranger or Lunar Orbiter, neither of which had any ability to land.
|
|
|
Post by Ginnie on Apr 8, 2008 20:46:33 GMT -4
Bob B., you gotta admit these are small points though. Wasn't the LM once known as LEM? I wonder who the guy really is. Maybe he'll post more pictures like he said he would.
The oddest part to me was when his friend happened to find video and pictures at of the mission at some 'container'. I mean what are the chances that: 1. This person knows Rutledge 2. Found pictures and video of a 'mission' that Rutledge just happened to be on. Also, to Rutledge the most important thing in the container was blank B/W photo paper?
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Apr 8, 2008 22:53:40 GMT -4
I saw the LM/LEM thing and noted that it switched a number of times, but then decided that if it weas a transcript then the issue was with the transcriber and not the speaker, unless he said it "El Em" and "El Ee Em" and that'd just be way wierd in itself.
|
|