|
Post by PhantomWolf on Sept 12, 2006 17:11:34 GMT -4
When the new mission goes to the moon with a rocket that isn't the size of the Empire State building, will they claim it's a hoax because it isn't big enough?
It might not even be as big as the Saturn V from what I've seen so far, though I'm willing to be corrected.
|
|
Al Johnston
"Cheer up!" they said, "It could be worse!" So I did, and it was.
Posts: 1,453
|
Post by Al Johnston on Sept 12, 2006 17:19:28 GMT -4
I thought they were going to use two: one for the lander & equipment, one for the crew module...
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Sept 12, 2006 17:35:55 GMT -4
If NASA is going to use modified shuttle main engines that means lots of bulky hydrogen in the lower stage. That will make for a big first stage, compared to the Saturn 5.
|
|
Bob B.
Bob the Excel Guru?
Posts: 3,072
|
Post by Bob B. on Sept 12, 2006 17:42:17 GMT -4
When the new mission goes to the moon with a rocket that isn't the size of the Empire State building, will they claim it's a hoax because it isn't big enough?It might not even be as big as the Saturn V from what I've seen so far, though I'm willing to be corrected. The original CaLV design using five SSME in the core stage was just a smidgeon smaller than the Saturn V. According to the ESAS report released in 2005, the CaLV (as it was called before being designated the Ares V) had the following preliminary specs: Gross Liftoff Weight: 6,393,975 lbm Overall Height: 357.6 ft The largest Saturn V/Apollo combination was Apollo 16: Gross Liftoff Weight: 6,537,238 lbm Overall Height: 363 ft Of course they have now redesigned the Ares V to use five RS-68 engines, which are less efficient. The lower efficiency requires adding more propellant and increasing the core stage diameter from 27.6 feet (same at the Shuttle ET) to 33 feet (same as the Saturn V). I haven’t seen any revised specs other than the height remaining at around 358 feet (a limitation of the VAB). I’ve tried to estimate the new mass taking into consideration the engine change. I calculate somewhere around 7,450,000 lbm. I thought they were going to use two: one for the lander & equipment, one for the crew module... They are. The Ares V will launch the Earth Departure Stage (EDS) and the Lunar Surface Access Module (LSAM). The Ares I will launch the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV).
|
|
|
Post by Obviousman on Sept 13, 2006 3:37:10 GMT -4
There was a serious proposal to re-open the F-1 production line for the Orion missions.
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Dec 12, 2006 17:22:37 GMT -4
If you would care to click on the banner ad entitled "Moon Landing Hoax" ( www.moonmovie.com )at the top of the page, you will see that the intro has changed. Whereas it did show footage of many of NASA's launch-pad failures, it now features a young lady who will explain to you, using Nazi war criminal turned NASA scientist Wernher von Braun's own calculations, why the Saturn V rocket would have needed to weigh 800,000 tons and been taller than the Empire State Building in NY in order to have reached the moon. The Saturn V rocket weighed 3000 tons I will stress again, that this is Wernher von Braun's calculation, not Bart Sibrel's. We heve never been to the moon, or anywhere near it. You are correct. The rockets they use to launch a satellite is three times that of the Saturn V.
|
|
|
Post by dwight on Dec 12, 2006 17:25:04 GMT -4
Here we go again. Woo hoo. Excuse while I really do go and get some vodka, 'cause I am going to need it. I look forward to the standard of this board lowering one more notch.
|
|
|
Post by Count Zero on Dec 12, 2006 17:27:47 GMT -4
The rockets they use to launch a satellite is three times that of the Saturn V. What is this rocket called?
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Dec 12, 2006 17:29:13 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Dec 12, 2006 17:40:10 GMT -4
If you would care to click on the banner ad entitled "Moon Landing Hoax" ( www.moonmovie.com )at the top of the page, you will see that the intro has changed. Whereas it did show footage of many of NASA's launch-pad failures, it now features a young lady who will explain to you, using Nazi war criminal turned NASA scientist Wernher von Braun's own calculations, why the Saturn V rocket would have needed to weigh 800,000 tons and been taller than the Empire State Building in NY in order to have reached the moon. The Saturn V rocket weighed 3000 tons I will stress again, that this is Wernher von Braun's calculation, not Bart Sibrel's. We heve never been to the moon, or anywhere near it. You are correct. The rockets they use to launch a satellite is three times that of the Saturn V. Three times what? Minty fresh? Fewer cavities? Cuter?
|
|
|
Post by james on Dec 12, 2006 17:40:24 GMT -4
Ummm the biggest Delta rocket is still smaller than the Saturn, can not carry as much into orbit and has less thrust. Your own link shows this... So what exactly did you mean by, "The rockets they use to launch a satellite is three times that of the Saturn V"? Because as far as I can see, there is nothing about the Delta rocket that out does the Saturn in anything.
|
|
|
Post by Count Zero on Dec 12, 2006 17:41:25 GMT -4
OK, following your link, it says that the most advanced version ( Delta IV) is 253.2 ft high, masses 1,616,800 lb and can lift up to 56,800 lb into Low Earth Orbit. The same resource lists the Saturn V as 363 ft high, massing 6,699,000 lb and able to put 118,000 kg (260,145 lbs) in Low Earth Orbit. In what way is the Delta "three times that of the Saturn V"?
|
|
|
Post by Moon Man on Dec 12, 2006 17:44:49 GMT -4
The Delta IV HEAVY out does the Saturn V.
|
|
|
Post by Count Zero on Dec 12, 2006 17:45:56 GMT -4
In what way? Which statistic?
|
|
|
Post by sts60 on Dec 12, 2006 17:47:03 GMT -4
The rockets they use to launch a satellite is three times that of the Saturn V.
The Delta IV HEAVY out does the Saturn V.
Wrong. Wildly wrong. Would you like to cite the numbers behind this claim, and your sources for those numbers?
|
|