|
Post by margamatix on Sept 2, 2005 20:47:38 GMT -4
OK. Vehicle insufficiently large to carry sufficient fuel.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Sept 2, 2005 20:27:53 GMT -4
I think you have lost track of the thread here, which is "Will Bart Sibrel offer a refund to dissatisfied customers?" , and since I have already offered to underwrite his guarantee, I would suggest that the thread is effectively closed.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Sept 2, 2005 19:12:02 GMT -4
Why do you always say this when you have no sensible reply?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Sept 2, 2005 18:37:18 GMT -4
The Apollo flies back and forth, the Saturn burns up like a Chinese firework, after it does JUST ONE JOB: Get the load off the ground. . OK, now think about the return journey from the moon. However the vehicles are configured or coupled, a certain amount of energy would be required to escape the moon's gravity. Since the moon has one-sixth of Earth's gravity, Earth's gravity would not begin to assist the craft until it was over 40,000 miles away from the moon. Look at the Command Module and compare it with the Saturn launcher. Do you really think that this machine could have travelled 40,000 miles from moon orbit? Come to that, do you really think the Lunar Module could have popped up 70 miles to meet it? And could have met it and coupled with it without incident, despite the completely untried nature of such a manoeuvre? Do you really think that a mission to the moon would not have commenced with an unmanned craft? Do you really think that six missions to the moon could have taken place without loss of life? Please think about it before you reply.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Sept 2, 2005 17:33:10 GMT -4
Why don't you order a video, view it with an open mind, and then decide if you want your money back?
I tell you what- if he refuses to refund your money, then I will buy the video for what you paid for it, and re-imburse your postage.
So what are you waiting for?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Sept 2, 2005 18:04:18 GMT -4
Well, that is interesting. I must confess that it is kind of fun when HBs like yourself are baited, Right. So who is the troll here?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 31, 2005 18:24:45 GMT -4
Hmm. Once again, logic passes you by. You base your question on the false premise that only the starter of this thread can be described as a troll. You have exhibited troll-like behaviour in numerous threads and indeed have started numerous threads with crass, troll-like enquiries. Well, in that case, why was I invited to contribute to another thread?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 31, 2005 18:17:16 GMT -4
So if you stood naked on the moon, but insulated from the surface, would you feel very hot or would you feel very cold?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 31, 2005 18:07:58 GMT -4
He's a troll, pretty clearly, Errrr, this thread was started by someone else and aimed at me? ? How can that make me a troll?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 31, 2005 18:03:18 GMT -4
We know you're only one guy, and presumably have other things to do then continuously monitor and answer posts from a dozen or so other people. Suggestion: pick just one of your technical claims - such as that there is no plausible way to cool a space suit on the Moon - and defend it. That should be manageable in terms of time, no? OK. On the moon, it is either very hot or very cold (the astronauts seem to be confused about which it is) Assuming it is very hot, then the backpacks would have been unable to reject that amount of heat for that duration of time. Whatever coolant they used, it would have been overwhelmed by the ambient temperature. That's why air-conditioning units are the size they are, in order to perform such a small reduction in temperature. Let me put it another way...... Design a PLSS for a goldfish which is to be immersed in a gallon of boiling water for three hours. The maximum mass of the PLSS is to be no more than 25% of the mass of the goldfish.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Aug 31, 2005 16:10:04 GMT -4
1) No
2) No
3) No
4) Don't know.
5) Yes
I am flattered to have become such an object of attention, but could I just ask that in future you start more generalised threads, as I do not have the time to answer everybody on every thread which is specifically directed towards me- thanks.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Sept 3, 2005 17:39:10 GMT -4
Ah yes, the famous "half-time football score"
Did you know that, when street corner bookmakers took bets on the seemingly random last four numbers of the Dow Jones index, that the Mafia arranged, on the 4th of July, that this number would end in "1776"?
So if a handful of dodgy Italians could do that, what limits could there be to the US Government's powers of flim-flammery?
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Sept 3, 2005 17:06:02 GMT -4
I consider "trolling" to be when someone posts with the intention of creating a negative emotional response (ie. anger) from the other members of the forum. I will usually let a little bit of this kind of behaviour slip through before I ban someone beause I really hate banning people, but I will do it when necessary. . Look, I just don't believe it happened. I genuinely believe the whole thing was faked. This is, largely, my "gut-reaction". But it is genuinely held. No-one has offered me proof that it happened. The most I have been offered is the suggestion that it theoretically could have happened. The worst accusation that could be levelled at me is that I have an incomplete knowledge of a very complicated branch of physics- rocket science. So complicated that "rocket science" has become a cliche in British English, to describe a subject which is difficult to understand. I hope I am not banned from this forum.I am invariably polite and courteous to other members, and I can't see any reason why I should be banned, other than that I believe Apollo was a hoax. And as I have said before, Apollo.hoax is the place to discuss this belief.
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Sept 2, 2005 19:57:08 GMT -4
Thank you, and I'm glad you've made the transition from lurker to member- welcome in!
I found this posting- from Lunar Orbit- to be more than a little menacing....
|
|
|
Post by margamatix on Sept 2, 2005 19:21:39 GMT -4
I have done a search, and cannot find any thread where these words were actually posted.-Could you kindly give me the url for the thread so I can look for myself- thanks.
|
|