|
Post by Trinitrotoluene on Jan 14, 2008 21:03:25 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by PhantomWolf on Jan 15, 2008 16:19:05 GMT -4
Well the ISS was highly visable over NZ last night around 9pm. Strangely the radio stations reported an influx of UFO sightings. Funny how no one who didn't know about it going over noticed its passage hmmmm.
|
|
|
Post by dwight on Jan 16, 2008 16:08:34 GMT -4
What is even funnier is Jarrah carrying on about his _copyright_ material being used against him! Geez I guess using SCF clearly marked copyright material against Mark is a completely different thing?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Gorsky on Jan 17, 2008 6:26:32 GMT -4
That's different, because Jarrah has "the truth" on his side.
|
|
|
Post by Trinitrotoluene on Jan 17, 2008 18:39:15 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Czero 101 on Jan 17, 2008 19:47:00 GMT -4
Great work, TNT.... Cz
|
|
|
Post by JayUtah on Jan 17, 2008 21:41:04 GMT -4
I've seen the ISS fly overhead many times, and it's the second brightest object in the night sky when it happens, the Moon being the first. It's also visibly moving -- unlike, say, Venus. The ISS is a frequent source of UFO reports. It's enough to make people stop what they're doing and take notice. If Jarrah admits that the Apollo 11 stack would be only slightly dimmer than the ISS then he cannot claim it will simply have passed unnoticed. "Night sky" in the above statement does not mean the entire nighttime period during which sunlight is absent. Nothing in the statement above should be construed to suggest that objects in low Earth orbit are, or should be, illuminated and visible during times when the positions of the object, the sun, and the viewer do not allow it. I would have thought that was obvious to anyone familiar with the conditions of celestial observation.
|
|