|
Post by AtomicDog on Mar 20, 2007 17:44:09 GMT -4
Is all this hoo-hah about Freemasons is because they are supposed to be the "gatekeepers of the hoax" or something? Like the Knights Templar of "Indiana Jones and the last Crusade"?
This is brilliant! The HBs have NASA entrusting the hoax to a Super-Secret Secret Society which will carry it down through the generations, bamboozling the public and killing those who get too close to the truth!
Great stuff! Heavenlybody, if you aren't making this into a movie script, you should be! Maybe you could get Mel Gibson interested.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Mar 20, 2007 11:14:48 GMT -4
Just check out the number of views. This is the most popular thread by far it would seem that viewers like this thread and the discussions that we have started.
What we enjoy is watching you crash and burn.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Mar 8, 2007 20:49:01 GMT -4
And the only computer used is the good old Mark I cerebral cortex.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Feb 23, 2007 11:13:18 GMT -4
You just keep narrowing the posts until nothing can fit through them so you can declare victory.Yep. If someone's determined to prove there's no evidence for something, he'll usually go to some pretty absurd lengths to ignore what's there. Pretty soon he's going to be rejecting examples because they're the wrong color. You must have been reading Straydog's (Duane Daman's) posts in the Education Forum. This guy can ignore a supernova exploding three feet in front of his face.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Jan 27, 2007 17:50:56 GMT -4
And Isaac Newton was an alchemist. So?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Jan 12, 2007 21:24:42 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Jan 12, 2007 8:51:19 GMT -4
Why is it that every single time that I have been able to see wires in TV and movies they have been black?
BTW, heavenlybody, nice job of channeling lunatic, there.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Nov 2, 2006 16:43:02 GMT -4
heavenlybody,
Look what you did to PhantomWolf! You have no honor!
*crosses arms and turns back to heavenlybody*
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 27, 2006 12:49:15 GMT -4
No, I was asking you if you were the poster called lunatic. If you read the post note that I was using the word as a noun, not an adjective.
And so far, your posts are fitting his pattern.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 19, 2006 10:17:13 GMT -4
lunatic, is that you?
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Sept 29, 2006 8:38:58 GMT -4
Great! Already stolen and reposted!
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Aug 20, 2006 16:55:16 GMT -4
Update: moonman just showed up. Hilarity ensues!
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Aug 17, 2006 14:53:18 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Oct 8, 2007 12:56:14 GMT -4
The videomaker could allow comments for a few days and then close comments, redirecting to apollohoax.
|
|
|
Post by AtomicDog on Jul 26, 2006 11:33:19 GMT -4
The conspiracy theorists claim that the burnout itself was a scripted part of the action. That is, it was planned from the start that the camera would "burn out" and thus deprive the audience of live television from that mission. This is alleged to be the second step in an escalation of visibility. Apollo 11's television coverage was very poor. Apollo 12's was expected to be better, but failed because of overexposure. Apollo 13 never landed on the moon, and finally by Apollo 14 we had high-quality television coverage from the lunar surface. Conspiracists say this was so the fakery techniques for live television could be worked on progressively, easing them into public acceptance. It seemed to have the opposite effect. By staging a string of failures, we get cries that "NASA can't do anything right!" (I know - I heard them) and mission cancellations. To me, that's called shooting yourself in the foot.
|
|