|
Post by inconceivable on Oct 16, 2008 17:44:36 GMT -4
I predict there will be a relationship on the ISS which will result in the first child being born in space. This will bring the world together like no other event in recent history.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Oct 8, 2008 18:37:58 GMT -4
Does anyone know where I can get some high resolution scans of Alan Bean paintings? Has anyone found any hidden messages in the Alan Bean paintings?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Sept 15, 2008 10:01:25 GMT -4
Just a thought. But since the Earth would look so big to an astronaut on the moon, this would surely be another light source. The earth has 5 times the reflecting power as the surface of the moon and a full earth sends 31 times as much light to an astronaut on the moon as a full moon sends to the earth.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Sept 2, 2008 16:57:10 GMT -4
I've tried the search function but and had no success. This was a statement from a chapter in The book of Popular Science Volume 4. So I was trying to get some clarification on the matter. The wide camera lens is a good suggestion. Are there any statements from the astronauts on the size of the Earth from the lunar surface - optically.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Sept 1, 2008 18:44:44 GMT -4
The pictures A11-40-5924 and AS14-64-9197 are pictures showing the Earth from the lunar surface.
If an astronaut was standing on the moon, the Earth size should be a disk 2.5 times the size of the moon seen from Earth. But in these two examples the Earth looks the same size as the moon would look standing on Earth. Are there any other pictures of the Earth from the lunar surface? Since there is no Earth rise or set, all Apollo lunar landings should have them. What is the reason for the Earth not looking any larger than the moon would look from Earth? Were these really Earth based pictures?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Aug 22, 2008 17:50:47 GMT -4
Do you guys realize he left on page 16? I would like to say thanks to John for bringing some of his theories to the forum. This was the most lively thread I've read in a long time here. Almost deleted this forum out of my favorites. I especially would like to here more about the atmosphere on the far side of the moon.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Aug 21, 2008 13:44:49 GMT -4
Are you guys sure that you are really talking to John Lear? The same John Lear that produced the KRLL paper, the Ducle papers, from the Lear Documents?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Aug 4, 2008 19:13:55 GMT -4
Hbs would probably say that it was an unmanned craft sent to the moon. The doppler shift in a signal caused by underwater acoustics where they trained in waters (30-130ft) doing tests in the equatorial latitudes of the Deep Sound Channel. The under water reciever from the submersible and the carrier moving relative to each other. Probably in the Bikini Islands. Notice that the signal station WWVL transmitted from 1963 ending in July 1972 after post production of Apollo 17.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jun 26, 2008 18:14:53 GMT -4
If you subscribe to the Earth/moon impact theory, it would be safe to assume that deep inside the earth is a part of the moon. A cavern with all the moon rocks you would ever want.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jun 23, 2008 15:39:53 GMT -4
One will notice through extensive research that the terra location would be a location with an enormous amount of water. Similar to the Coral Castle process. This underground lake is needed to create the gravitational anomaly to achieve this phenomenon. The event would be achieved at neap tides or first quarter phases. The deep cavern sandwiched between an underground lake causes the anomaly needed during the first quarter phases. Examples - 7/20/1969 - 11/19/1969- 2/3/1971- 7/30/1971- 4/20/1972 - 12/11/1972 The Neap tide during the missions allowed 2 EVAs per day. Starting the EVAs at the low tides and ending them at high tides. Possibly
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jun 16, 2008 10:17:49 GMT -4
Gravitational anomalies are found around the world. Maybe a pre existing cavern was found?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jun 15, 2008 20:45:24 GMT -4
If gravity decreases while approaching the center of the Earth, how far down would this cavern have to be to simulate the moon's gravity?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jun 4, 2008 21:48:18 GMT -4
This is a good question. No country in the world has ever sent another satellite to the moon with the resolution to identify anything at any of the landing sites. Also, where are the images from the orbiting Command Service Modules? They were only 60n miles up orbiting the landing sites with instrument bays loaded with cameras. We know that in the CSM they were able to spot the LEMs on the surface of the moon with their periscopes. So where are these camera pictures? Maybe they don't show anything absolute.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jun 3, 2008 16:12:02 GMT -4
I suspect it would be similar to when the Discovery Channel paid to have Gus Grisssom's Mercury capsule Liberty Bell 7 retrieved from 3 miles down in the ocean. It is considered government property even though they retrieved it. It is now at some museum in Kansas.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on May 29, 2008 0:09:06 GMT -4
FUD. More FUD. What does this mean. Is this mean? If so I definitely offends>d
|
|