|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on Jul 17, 2010 2:12:49 GMT -4
Yo Dead Hoosiers. And here I was thinking that 'birther' nonsense was dying down.... BTW, how's the global flu pandemic, forced vaccinations, and internment camps doing? The flu scare petered out, as you know. The vaccines were, for the most part, not forced, nor did they contain a more severe form of H1N1, but it killed a maimed, as most vaccines do. The internment camps are doing great and will be open for business soon. I'm just trying to decide who'll get tossed in...illegal aliens (because a lot of people are getting fed up) or the unemployed when their benefits finally come to an end. Or maybe the birthers?
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on Jul 16, 2010 18:28:26 GMT -4
Let's pretend for a minute that Obama really was born in Kenya and is a Muslim. So what? Is he somehow inferior because of those specific traits? How could he possibly do a worse job than a particular "real American" from Texas? Explain to me why this theory isn't based on bigotry. I kind of doubt people would make such a big deal out of his history if he was a white Christian who was hiding the fact that he was really born in Canada. I'm really starting to get sick of racists and other hateful people. Okay. I'll explain it to you. 1. It's the law. 2. This law attempts insure that our president and commander in chief doesn't have divided loyalties. Please explain to me how this is racist.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on Apr 30, 2010 18:05:02 GMT -4
The wording in the AZ law is being revised as follows:
"Changes to the bill language will actually remove the word "solely" from the sentence, "The attorney general or county attorney shall not investigate complaints that are based solely on race, color or national origin."
Another change replaces the phrase "lawful contact" with "lawful stop, detention or arrest" to apparently clarify that officers don't need to question a victim or witness about their legal status.
A third change specifies that police contact over violations for local civil ordinances can trigger questioning on immigration status.
The law is constitutional because illegals do not have constitutional rights--only citizens have constitutional rights. Everyone else has human rights and those don't entitle them to jobs, health care, education, welfare, etc. And while most of the illegal immigrants into AZ are Mexican, there are thousands of other illegals from every corner of the globe in this country.
This law may lead to a national ID card and I wouldn't like that to happen. I understand that everyone who is arrested, regardless of race, will have to prove citizenship before being released. It's a pity that Mexico has so abused our open border that we've come to this, but it's about time. We're talking about millions of people--not just a few thousand. Other states are following AZ's lead. If the feds did their job in the first place this wouldn't have happened.
Business won't be able to exploit illegal workers anymore either.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on Mar 25, 2010 19:37:56 GMT -4
All of it should be taught (evolution, creationism, ID). Just don't do it in a science class. Students should be exposed to all these theories, both pro and con.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 3, 2009 17:34:32 GMT -4
Is everybody here an illiterate? I'm not hyping the dangers of the swine flu--it's our government and mass media that's blowing the danger way out of proportion. What I'm jacked up about is that this is a perfect opportunity for the government to take some more of our freedoms and they appear to be jumping on it. Obama wants to spend billions fighting this fake flu scare.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 23:18:04 GMT -4
An off-topic nitpick, it was Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, not the original Law & Order. And the woman who didn't vaccinate her child was acquitted. Either way, as we all know, the Law & Order franchise is an excellent source of legal information. Just like the CSI franchise and forensics. (Well, to be fair, Law & Order is better. Not the point.) As goes Law & Order, so go the emergency FEMA concentration camps. So here's my question. If vaccines are so worthless and actually spread the disease they claim to prevent, what happened to smallpox? www.naturodoc.com/library/public_health/truth_re_smallpox_vaccine.htmThis isn't the only article on the topic by any means.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 18:55:40 GMT -4
The World Health Organization states that beginning at Level 3, as I recall, countries should consider instituting emergency powers. Those differ from country to country and state to state. Check what's on the agenda for your country.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 18:15:03 GMT -4
Let me add a link to the Baxter vaccine contamination story. www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/02/27/8560781.htmlThis is the company the WHO is working with to produce a vaccine for the Mexican swine flu. Should this so-called pandemic go to Level 6 (unlikely at this point). We'd all be forced to take their swill. Anyone eager to get a jab now?
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 17:58:47 GMT -4
I get a flu jab every year. I am not relating this to swine flu, just that in having the flu jab every year I suffer the flu a heck of a lot less. Asthmatic and used to cop it usually once a year at least. Now I have suffered it once in the last six years. It really is a no brainer, have the jab and it reduces the chances of me getting whatever is brewing that winter. No jab and its suffering time, probably. Mr Jones is not a doctor and I would ask are you Dead Hoosiers? I would and will put more stock in my doctor. I'm not advising you or anyone to turn to Alex Jones for medical advice. I'm saying do your own research. If whatever your doc tells you is good enough for you then that's that. Most people have no apparent adverse effects from vaccines, but I think they'd be surprised to learn how they're made, what's in them, and the reported adverse affects. There is also the question of just how much immunity they provide and for how long. The flu shot is a real crap-shoot. I should think Baxter being caught contaminating its own vaccine with live virus would make even the most die-hard believer sit up and take notice.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 17:53:48 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 15:53:58 GMT -4
There's this. It's a starting point for looking into it further. www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/health/09flu.html?_r=1&hpIf you can find sources that say it works, you can also find sources that say it doesn't if you choose to look. I want to emphasize that people should do some significant investigation of vaccine dangers before putting this stuff into their own bodies let alone rallying behind government efforts to force this stuff on unwilling people. I was appalled by an episode I saw on Law & Order this week where a woman who chose not to vaccinate her child against measles was depicted as a murderer. Seriously. Hunt down some information on the history of vaccines and how much collateral damage they've caused, how ineffective they are and how they cause the diseases they purport to prevent. It's only recently that dentists have stopped using silver amalgam fillings, finally admitting that the mercury in them is dangerous. Hopefully we can get fluoride out of our water supply soon. If a safe vaccine can be created, I'd be for it. Do your own research. It's your body. Not mine. Not the governments. Keep in mind that people and corporations will do terrible things for profit. With that, I'm done on this topic.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 14:55:54 GMT -4
Good question. In a pandemic, this drug will be more valuable than gold (even though it doesn't work, but most people haven't checked that out). Big pharma isn't going to give it away. They're going to sell it. No panic, no sales. The monsters!! How dare they try to recoup the costs involved in manufacturing durgs, and then try to invest those profits in new drug research! It's almost as if they expect to be PAID for doing their job! So you're okay with them selling a drug which is known to be ineffective against H1N1?
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 14:40:54 GMT -4
Good question. In a pandemic, this drug will be more valuable than gold (even though it doesn't work, but most people haven't checked that out). Big pharma isn't going to give it away. They're going to sell it. No panic, no sales. Well, I don't know how they do it in the US, but when the UK government buys stocks of drugs for situations like this, it is for use by the NHS at the point of treatment, as and when required. Initial cost is irrelevant. I'm not sure what arrangements our government has with the pharmaceutical companies. Flu vaccines are free to us. A drug like Tamiflu is obtained by prescription from the doctor and paid for by the individual at a pharmacy.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 14:24:16 GMT -4
Jones cites his sources which can be checked. And when they are and he's shown to be wrong, it bothers you not at all. The news information he provides hasn't been proven wrong. It's verifiable. I'm repeating myself here, but I think what people disagree with is what Jones makes of the news--global takeover.
|
|
|
Post by Dead Hoosiers on May 1, 2009 14:12:43 GMT -4
One thing in that infowars.com article still intrigues me - it mentions the fact that all the Tamiflu doses that the US and UK governments bought up in 2005 and 2006 is approaching the end of it's shelf life... why is that relevant, may I ask? Good question. In a pandemic, this drug will be more valuable than gold (even though it doesn't work, but most people haven't checked that out). Big pharma isn't going to give it away. They're going to sell it. No panic, no sales.
|
|