|
Post by PhantomWolf on Nov 23, 2010 15:42:43 GMT -4
Circumstantial evidence can be suitable for an accusation, indictment or even a conviction of a crime. It really depends on the strength of the evidence. Very True.
|
|
|
Post by lionking on Nov 23, 2010 16:14:15 GMT -4
thnx guys. Belmar said this too but there were doubt casting by Nasralla. then Belmar said he has also other types of proofs. he didn't name the suspects yet, but he commented on the last leak describing it as dangerous and may put certain lives in danger.. I think this shows that the information in it has some credibility. Hariri stupidly said that he trusts Wissam al Hassan. Another deputy close to him said that the tribunal made sure that he made the exam and looked into his papers. I don't know ..we are confused.. anyhow, belmar said that in the near future he will give Fransin his report.. we'll have to wait a little bit.
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Nov 23, 2010 18:26:14 GMT -4
Circumstantial evidence can be suitable for an accusation, indictment or even a conviction of a crime. It really depends on the strength of the evidence. Very True.I don't want to hijack the thread, but another example seems in order. Cameron Todd Willingham was convinced in Texas of murder of his children by arson and executed on the basis of a forensic interpretation of circumstantial evidence. The interpretation has come under significant criticism and been shown to have used outdated and disproved science. Circumstantial evidence requires an interpretation and its validity relies on skill of the interpreter.
|
|
|
Post by lionking on Nov 24, 2010 6:25:30 GMT -4
If I remember well how bellmare put it , he said that if we wake up and the road is wet, and the sky didn't rain, and the municipality didn't clean, then we deduce that surely someone has thrown water on the floor. He said this evidence is as strong as other evidence.
so if the reports are true, they can proove that the cellphones were opened on Hariri's schedule and activities, and there was no Israeli spy that HA claims to have been monitoring at that day, so they can deduce that the HA network was following up on Hariri himself.. maybe this is how it works.
|
|
|
Post by lionking on Jan 18, 2011 14:16:37 GMT -4
Belmar finally submits his report of indictment. Fransin has to review it then make it public www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/getstory?openform&623E6E3539BB4F01C225781C0035E9A8and we woke up today on gatherings for Hizbollahis who were to do something big that was postponed and my important work for today was postponed and I went mad.. it was a James Bond-ic day.. I am worried really what are they going to do. the indictment is not yet public and this is what they did and children were out of schools. what would they do if the tribunal said what is expected? anyhow, I hope jsutice will prevail, but as my friend told me, if they don't accuse syria then the head of the snake is still there. this snake found tools for it for assassinating before HA, and if HA is really accused, they can find another tool. The Syrians should be accused and braught to justice. but I don't think it is possible sadly.
|
|
|
Post by lionking on Jan 24, 2011 5:35:07 GMT -4
The Biggest Surprize yesterday was the so called Star Witness and then false witness broadcasting a tape for what he implied is the Syrian official in Lebanon at the time of Hariri's death. The official was being told that Abou Adas, the one who has a tape filmed saying that he is going to kill Hariri, refuse to blow himslef in Hariri becasue AHriri is moslem, and the official-Rostom Ghazali- says that Abou Adas should be told that Hariri is an infidel and that he will speak to Maher al assad, brother of bashar. After that Maher is supposed to have called another officer, who said he will put Abou Adas back in prison. www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/getstory?openform&7B33C4E8B2A6DC5AC2257822002EF7D9I think that KSA held Zuhair before from putting the tape to see what they can do with Syria, and when the KSA-Syrian agreement failed and now with Nasralla and co refusing Saad el Hariri to be back in power, they told him to broadcast this taep and threaten to brioadcast others so that the Syrians get back and agree on Saad el Hariri... lots of information were said yesterday, includign that Ghazi Kenaan , the Syrian official who was mysteriously murdered and claimed to have committed suicide, gave one of the tapes for Zuhair. I think that the truth is coming and Zuhair said he will send another video where Abou Adas is shown being beaten and refusing to kill Hariri.
|
|
|
Post by lionking on Jan 25, 2011 8:27:13 GMT -4
hariri droppped out of the government..I can't believe it..they won and they controlled lebanon again
|
|
|
Post by echnaton on Jan 25, 2011 15:38:52 GMT -4
I've read some reports that the security forces have arrested some former members of the Hariri government.
Hassan Nasrallah, who dresses like an Iranian Mullah, is quoted in an open message to Hariri "Let's work in the same government. If you refuse to take part that means you want to monopolize power." Brilliant logic.
|
|
|
Post by lionking on Jan 27, 2011 3:36:05 GMT -4
I've read some reports that the security forces have arrested some former members of the Hariri government. Hassan Nasrallah, who dresses like an Iranian Mullah, is quoted in an open message to Hariri "Let's work in the same government. If you refuse to take part that means you want to monopolize power." Brilliant logic. He means that Hariri will refuse to take part in the government if he doesn't have it all, but this BS. They did May 7 events and the government was forced to agree on the blocking third so they now could topple the government, every decision was made upon agreement with them except the international tribunal and the Head of Parliament who is an ally with them wasn't removed by the majority although they could. This means that Hariri doesn't want ot monopolize power. Now, the president is not with anyone, the Head of parliament is with them, and so is the prime minister, so who monopolizes power? and where is the Taef agreement's and constitution's spirit of sharing power among all? when taef was there, it was for the religions to have a share in power, but now the government is divided between two ideologies and not religions, and there is a big portion, at least half of the lebanese who feel outside power. doesn't this make Nasralla's pea-sized brain think that this is dangerous? Wait, this is not all the story of bringing Mikati. Walid Junblat, who was formerly with March 14, still wanted Hariri[he has the balance here becasue of his votes]. They sent armed forces next to his region to threaten him so he then agreed to name Mikati. He said that he wanted Saad but the situation required this. This means they used their weapons to put a Sunni candidate against the will of the Sunna Now Hariri lost credibility himself. He went for talks shadowed by the KSA-Syrian talks. One of the issues was cancelling the tribunal. The moment he agreed to speak about it this makes people doubtful. He also went to Bashar and said he accused Syria politically and becasue of false witnesses which is utter nonsense becasue M14 accused Syria at the same day of the urder. He told Nastrall that if the indictment names any of HA members he will say that th leadership has nothing to do with the murder and those are undisciplined members..step down after step down after step down..and here we are..now he told the newspaper that killers of his father removed him from power..who would believe him now? I heard his previous member of parialment say tha tthey are preparign a surprize, but sorry ..this time I am not going to the street .. even if he comes, he can't calm down HA and he doesn't seem to have support from the neighbouring states..he will be tie-handed
|
|