|
Post by inconceivable on Nov 28, 2007 23:29:03 GMT -4
Because of the limited space inside the hanger certain areas had to be resurfaced with the overhead blower fans. This inadvertantly erased many foot prints and also caused the flag to blow many times.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Nov 5, 2007 17:49:52 GMT -4
Also, Disney had eight if the first Hewlett-Packard 200B computers back in 1939 .
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Nov 1, 2007 17:25:47 GMT -4
Did the Apollo Service Module cameras have the resolution to pick up the artifacts left by the astronauts? The area Sector 1 of the service module had panaramic cameras, mapping cameras along with other instrumentations. I've read that the CSMs oribited the moon at around 60 n miles. Ron Evans did a space walk to retrieve film canisters from the service module. Can somebody direct me to any Apollo CSM photos of the surface of the moon? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Oct 4, 2007 15:12:06 GMT -4
Purpose is just merely research. Yes , they did walk on the moon.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Oct 4, 2007 11:33:42 GMT -4
Does anyone know of links to quotes from astronaouts that walked on the moon stating that they walked on the surface of the moon? Anything written or filmed?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Sept 27, 2007 19:26:34 GMT -4
It's quite evident that one can by examining the evidence quite clearly ascertain the real history of all of these fancifal claims about Apollo and UFOs. One only has to look closely. Let's start with the foo fighters from WWII. Not ours or theirs. Craft finally obtained at Roswell. The word is out and the race is on. The "cold war" starts. A collaborative effort to secretively hunt down the rest of them. The "cold war" an easy descriptive word to indicate who the war is really against and where they would be found. The coldest areas of the planet, space and the moon. Arctic, Antarctic, depths of the oceans and the moon. The ETs are what the world was looking for during the "Cold War." Not the cover story, the Russians. The spread of communism was a result of this search. After the fall of Berlin, a U.S. armada is sent to Antarctica under Admiral Byrd to find and eliminate and capture the remaining. A major battle ensued. Classified to this day. Missions followed over the Arctic capturing many photographs. Many crafts were taken brought back to the states - Area 51 and S4. Many bases would be built first on Indian reservations outside of applicable US laws. The space race was just a cover to get to the moon to see where they were and what they could do about it. Apollo 11 and the rest dropped their packages from orbit to show them we could get there and precisely drop our nukes on target. After that an agreement and truce with the ETs. No landings were allowed. The US and USSR made a treaty with the ET's somewhat like Close Encounters. The USSR were never allowed to land humans either. Technologies are exchanged with the US at Area 51 a sort of ET embassy on US soil for their continued genetic research. That's it. In a nutshell.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Aug 25, 2007 20:51:40 GMT -4
Suppose Apollo 13 capsule was really just on the bottom of the ocean for a while? Would it parallel the conditions they encountered in space? Crew getting really cold and condensation in the CSM. What if this were not a hypothetical question?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Aug 13, 2007 17:46:40 GMT -4
If you had come across something that definitely proved that the Apollo moon landings were hoaxed, would you come forward or would you take it to your grave?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jul 12, 2007 12:48:22 GMT -4
Would the effect of lowering the helium to this low temperature create a reduced gravity situation? Helium at low temperatures seems to defy gravity. If a room were to achieve the crtitical temp of Helium where it was a liquid and a gas at the same time? What would -173C Helium room simulate?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jul 12, 2007 10:53:00 GMT -4
Now could the temperature in the building be lowered enough to simulate the temperature of the moon. While cooling the helium to this temperature what sort of environment would this create. Would this create a liquid hydrogen environment?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jul 4, 2007 19:28:38 GMT -4
So what if an entire Area 51 sized building was filled and sealed with Helium for the purpose of filming some Apollo footage. In a sense a clean room was created so that dust and dirt could be more easily simulated. Dust and dirt sink faster in Helium than in normal air. Now the Apollo suits consist of an inner suit and outer suit. Suppose between the inner suit and the outer suit Helium was inserted to lighted the affects of the suit. How would the astronauts look hopping around?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jul 18, 2007 20:36:36 GMT -4
We'll just have to wait for Google Moon.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jul 7, 2007 13:15:36 GMT -4
National pride and to advance science. Maybe NASA should have another contest to see who can detect the artifacts first.
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jul 7, 2007 12:15:58 GMT -4
It is hard to believe that there is no other source that can be used to detect the LMs and Rovers, etc. other than photos. The CSMs from Apollo were full of instruments and some missions even released their own satellites. Was there anything on the CSMs that could have also detected the LMs and Rovers on the moon? What about all of the other satellites that have gone to the moon? Didn't they have any other types of instrumentations besides cameras? I'm still a little shocked about RADAR not being able to pick up anything. I just figured that they would show up on RADAR precisely where they left them. If they can hit the reflectors left on the moon with lasers why can't they also hit the LMS and Rovers to determine their locations?
|
|
|
Post by inconceivable on Jul 3, 2007 18:12:17 GMT -4
If you go to www.friends-partners.org/oldfriends/mwade/craft/lmdlsion.htm scroll down to Consequences of eliminating the Apollo CSM rendezvous radar it clearly states the CSM radar would be tracking the LEM while on the surface of the moon in order to update the launch conditions. So it is not just a clear "No" for an answer.
|
|